"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:mg7hs3ti6mptnd01orgnt4jrb5cdlohu0p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:32:48 -0500, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel"
> <xxx0110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>
>>
>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:p1hes3543757ajd5m5sejpp2tlsd4lllfe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:54:45 -0500, the following appeared
>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel"
>>> <xxx0110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bob Casanova" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:ooubs3t0nso70qf2kr4vkuvttb3bv8trss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:53:13 -0500, the following appeared
>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Hybrid Angel"
>>>>> <xxx0110@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Muslim, Barry Hussein Obama.......
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong again, as usual.
>>>>
>>>>'Barry' is right.....
>>>
>>> Woo-hoo...
>>
>>Going to be Boo Hoo if Obamamamma ****er wins...
>>>
>>>>>>Barry was his name in his High School Year Book....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He's a whitified nigger.....
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting comment.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks....
>>>
>>> You're welcome.
>
>>> <snip bigotry>
>
> <snip more bigotry>
>
>>Grow up, will you.....
>
> Been there; done that. What about my recognition that you're
> a religious fundie and a bigot makes me other than adult?
I'm going to be reasonable here...no bigotry. Just facts.....
You're wrong.....the Philosophy is NOT a religion. It recognizes something
more than just human beings. We would have to be pretty damn arrogant
to think otherwise....
We believe in the CREATOR|OWNER....His son....legions/hosts/angels
/ETs, and the Kingdom! A physical hierarchy.....which you don't understand
Because, YOU ALL think, YOU ALL there be.....
>
> <snip more bigotry>
>
>>>>> Are all fundies bigots, or are you in the minority?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not religious. I'm a realist......when it comes to HaShem.....
>>>>I'm in nobodies camp.....but His.....
>>>
>>> ...which makes you a fundie, and since your bigotry has been
>>> clearly established by your own posts the answer to my
>>> question would be "I am, but I can't answer for the others".
>>> Thanks for clarifying.
>>
>>Here's some more clarification....
>
> <snip more rambling irrelevantia>
>
>>> <snip irrelevantia>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless
If the observation is a marking in oil seed rape, (snaps like celery
went bent just a little bit). Markings have been found in those fields
the stalks bent an inch from the ground, flattened hard to the ground
and swirled. And the yellow flowers at the top...untouched...
Upon investigation, at the bend of the stalks, there are tiny holes.
As if steam was used to soften it for bending.
That observation is null and void. Ignored.....and that's wrong...
It should put the hoaxers out of business. Or at least acknowledge
another source....and give them those markings....the ones they know
aren't hoaxed......
The Circle Makers should be required to put diagrams of the markings
they are going to hoax, on their Web Site, BEFORE the fact of them
appearing. Not AFTER the goddamned fact! ANYONE can do that....
Liars, Cheats and Deception OH MY..
Pure reason...
http://www.lucypringle.co.uk/photos/
enjoy....
All hoaxed? Or another source too.....
Now be reasonable...
|
