On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:30:26 GMT, "Al Zheimers"
<al_zheimers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>ca-turbine <turbine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Subject: Re: Pretty dead in here.
>
>
>And I can't tell you how happy that makes me.
>Some truly fine work has been done here.
>
>
>> I wonder if pop stars' stardom parallels the
>> traffic in their Usenet news groups.
>
>
>I think your "wonder" is a valid concern; as I,
>once upon a time - did my best to make sure
>the visitors here would open their eyes and
>ears and see the topic for what she was and
>still is. And I have to say that I'm extremely
>pleased with the outcome of my hard work.
>The "traffic" in here is exactly where it should
>be at this point in time. There's nothing of
>any substance being posted because there's
>no topic under any heading other than SKANK,
>and it's become clear to most that there is
>only so much you can say about a SKANK
>before everyone eventually grows tired and
>finds other, more fulfilling places to be and
>tasks to undertake -- as proved by the long
>list of SPAM headers from top to bottom in
>this group's current list. I just can't tell you
>how pleased this makes me.
>
>
>> This group is dead. Does that mean Christina's
>> career is careening downhill?
>
>
>I say good riddance to nasty trash. Let the
>dead bury the dead. Although I do enjoy
>watching the SKANK's flailing arms as she
>reaches for anything to grab onto to slow
>the "downhill" runaway sled that's become
>her life. You know --- if you think about it,
>she's taken enough money off enough
>dumbasses to live the good life for the
>remainder of her SKANK-FEST life. That is,
>if she spends it wisely. Even if she never
>produces another piece of dog **** recording
>for her butt-plugged fans -- if she starts
>running low on funds -- all she has to do
>every five years or so is put out a so-called
>"greatest hits" CD and all the morons who
>never caught on to the truth about the
>SKANK will throw more money at her and
>she can crawl back into her SKANK-hole for
>another five years or so. Of course this
>fan-base will lessen more and more as time
>passes, so she may have to sell the mansion
>and move to Palm Springs or one of the
>lessor known towns of the area. But as long
>as the pop DJ's keep playing that ignorant
>"i am beautiful" song of hers' -- that should
>keep the dumbest of the dumb SKANK-fans
>hoping for more Crusty-crap to throw their
>money at. I do believe that; if all the DJ's
>would just stop playing her crap for a couple
>of years -- and the comedy writers could
>restrain themselves -- pretty much everybody
>except the truly pure morons would forget all
>about the SKANK that is; Crusty Uguilera ---
>and the true fans in this group would finally
>be rewarded for their own fine and consistent
>work over the last four or five years. We
>deserve to see her disappear forever -- or
>at least - NO more TV spots or magazine
>shots to gross us out. But of course -- the
>poodle-head shots are ALWAYS appreciated.
>
>
>> If so, that has both an upside and a downside.
>> The upside is, she'd become a singing **** star.
>
>
>I get what you are trying to say, but if the
>whore sings at all -- that's the "downside".
>She really does have a horrible singing style
>and her influence has done a lot of damage
>to some of the more tolerable young artists.
>Those of you who understand this fact know
>what she did to Kelly Clarkson after they
>worked together for a brief while. Kelly's
>still doing pretty well but I fear the damage
>the Crusty One caused may not fade for
>quite some time. I love to watch her on stage
>but every one in a while I hear Crusty coming
>through in her voice and it just makes me
>cringe. It's up to the people around her to
>bring this huge problem to Kelly's attention
>so it can be dealt with swiftly so it doesn't
>turn too many fans away.
>
>
>(And again)
>> The upside is, she'd become a singing **** star.
>
>
>And really....isn't she already a "**** star" ?
>
>
>> The downside is, she might not.
>
>
>As long as she never shows her face again
>anywhere at anytime -- that's the "upside".
>So there is no "downside" as long as she
>sticks to seclusion -- or to the shopping
>malls and carnivals and low profile ribbon
>cutting ceremonies. Most im****tantly -- that
>she NEVER EVER gets pumped into my living
>room by the media. Unless it's about a good
>event in her life. And by *good* - I of course
>mean *bad* event. Like the disclosure that
>her ***** gets attacked by that flesh eating
>bacteria, and it dies after a 30 minute meal.
>(The bacteria --- NOT the *****). It's either
>a partial loss -- or it's a really small *****.
>Either way -- the virus dies and a topical
>ointment is created from the antibodies. Now
>that's news worthy.
>
>
>> If she did, it would more or less be an
>> extension of some of her previous vids --
>> Dirrty, for example. So, instead of just
>> doing bumps and grinds, she gets banged.
>
>
>I do wish you'd stop with the mental imagery
>of this beast having *** with any other
>creature. It's really disturbing to those of
>us who keep our SKANK-meters set way low
>to ward off the gag reflex.
>
>
>In closing --- I'd like to say hello to all the
>true fans of this group's grotesque topic -
>from the past few years. And I wanted you
>all to know how much I've appreciated your
>work and your loyalty to the cause for all
>these years. You've done some great work,
>as attested to by all the SPAM headers that
>fill the group now. I wanted to get back by
>here for a quick post during the last year or
>so but I just kept finding other things to do;
>once I popped in and saw that you guys had
>everything under control. There really wasn't
>anything left for me to do or say. ;o}
>
>
>So; good work and good luck. As I'm certain
>most of you have wandered off to find other
>pieces of dog **** to destroy after your work
>here was done. I do wish I could join you
>but time just doesn't permit putting the
>ugly in their places anymore. Nor the horrid
>little divas back into their keereeOHkeey
>bars. I know you'll do fine without me -- as
>you earned yours stripes in Crusty's house.
>Who can survive your onslaught of truth over
>fiction...?
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>AZ
>02-02-05; 10:39
>
>
But, Al, half the fun of visiting this group was reading the epistles
from you and your posse.
For example, it's interesting to see the divergent views on
Christina's skankyness/whorishness/sluttyness. It appals some so much
they would have her committed to the fires of hell immediately.
Others are hoping that she'll continue on and make the leap into ****.
ca-turbine
|
