ca-turbine <turbine@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Subject: Re: Pretty dead in here.
And I can't tell you how happy that makes me.
Some truly fine work has been done here.
> I wonder if pop stars' stardom parallels the
> traffic in their Usenet news groups.
I think your "wonder" is a valid concern; as I,
once upon a time - did my best to make sure
the visitors here would open their eyes and
ears and see the topic for what she was and
still is. And I have to say that I'm extremely
pleased with the outcome of my hard work.
The "traffic" in here is exactly where it should
be at this point in time. There's nothing of
any substance being posted because there's
no topic under any heading other than SKANK,
and it's become clear to most that there is
only so much you can say about a SKANK
before everyone eventually grows tired and
finds other, more fulfilling places to be and
tasks to undertake -- as proved by the long
list of SPAM headers from top to bottom in
this group's current list. I just can't tell you
how pleased this makes me.
> This group is dead. Does that mean Christina's
> career is careening downhill?
I say good riddance to nasty trash. Let the
dead bury the dead. Although I do enjoy
watching the SKANK's flailing arms as she
reaches for anything to grab onto to slow
the "downhill" runaway sled that's become
her life. You know --- if you think about it,
she's taken enough money off enough
dumb***** to live the good life for the
remainder of her SKANK-FEST life. That is,
if she spends it wisely. Even if she never
produces another piece of dog **** recording
for her butt-plugged fans -- if she starts
running low on funds -- all she has to do
every five years or so is put out a so-called
"greatest hits" CD and all the morons who
never caught on to the truth about the
SKANK will throw more money at her and
she can crawl back into her SKANK-hole for
another five years or so. Of course this
fan-base will lessen more and more as time
p*****, so she may have to sell the mansion
and move to Palm Springs or one of the
lessor known towns of the area. But as long
as the pop DJ's keep playing that ignorant
"i am beautiful" song of hers' -- that should
keep the dumbest of the dumb SKANK-fans
hoping for more Crusty-crap to throw their
money at. I do believe that; if all the DJ's
would just stop playing her crap for a couple
of years -- and the comedy writers could
restrain themselves -- pretty much everybody
except the truly pure morons would forget all
about the SKANK that is; Crusty Uguilera ---
and the true fans in this group would finally
be rewarded for their own fine and consistent
work over the last four or five years. We
deserve to see her disappear forever -- or
at least - NO more TV spots or magazine
shots to gross us out. But of course -- the
poodle-head shots are ALWAYS appreciated.
> If so, that has both an upside and a downside.
> The upside is, she'd become a singing **** star.
I get what you are trying to say, but if the
whore sings at all -- that's the "downside".
She really does have a horrible singing style
and her influence has done a lot of damage
to some of the more tolerable young artists.
Those of you who understand this fact know
what she did to Kelly Clarkson after they
worked together for a brief while. Kelly's
still doing pretty well but I fear the damage
the Crusty One caused may not fade for
quite some time. I love to watch her on stage
but every one in a while I hear Crusty coming
through in her voice and it just makes me
cringe. It's up to the people around her to
bring this huge problem to Kelly's attention
so it can be dealt with swiftly so it doesn't
turn too many fans away.
(And again)
> The upside is, she'd become a singing **** star.
And really....isn't she already a "**** star" ?
> The downside is, she might not.
As long as she never shows her face again
anywhere at anytime -- that's the "upside".
So there is no "downside" as long as she
sticks to seclusion -- or to the shopping
malls and carnivals and low profile ribbon
cutting ceremonies. Most im****tantly -- that
she NEVER EVER gets pumped into my living
room by the media. Unless it's about a good
event in her life. And by *good* - I of course
mean *bad* event. Like the disclosure that
her ***** gets attacked by that flesh eating
bacteria, and it dies after a 30 minute meal.
(The bacteria --- NOT the *****). It's either
a partial loss -- or it's a really small *****.
Either way -- the virus dies and a topical
ointment is created from the antibodies. Now
that's news worthy.
> If she did, it would more or less be an
> extension of some of her previous vids --
> Dirrty, for example. So, instead of just
> doing bumps and grinds, she gets banged.
I do wish you'd stop with the mental imagery
of this beast having *** with any other
creature. It's really disturbing to those of
us who keep our SKANK-meters set way low
to ward off the gag reflex.
In closing --- I'd like to say hello to all the
true fans of this group's grotesque topic -
from the past few years. And I wanted you
all to know how much I've appreciated your
work and your loyalty to the cause for all
these years. You've done some great work,
as attested to by all the SPAM headers that
fill the group now. I wanted to get back by
here for a quick post during the last year or
so but I just kept finding other things to do;
once I popped in and saw that you guys had
everything under control. There really wasn't
anything left for me to do or say. ;o}
So; good work and good luck. As I'm certain
most of you have wandered off to find other
pieces of dog **** to destroy after your work
here was done. I do wish I could join you
but time just doesn't permit putting the
ugly in their places anymore. Nor the horrid
little divas back into their keereeOHkeey
bars. I know you'll do fine without me -- as
you earned yours stripes in Crusty's house.
Who can survive your onslaught of truth over
fiction...?
Best regards,
AZ
02-02-05; 10:39
|
