1) Read a book. Finish Chapter 1. Are you then required to read chapter 1
again before reading chapter 2? When you read chapter 2 are you then
required to read chapter 1 again, then chapter 2, in order to read chapter
3? Ad nauseum. Bottom posting is a hark back to Bulletin Boards in 1993
when retention was poor. It's 2003 now. Grow up, you ****.
2) I'd forgotten why I'd stopped posting to this newsgroup a couple of
years ago. Odious replies.
3) Where do you live, you obnoxious prick? Do an nslookup on my domain.
I'm not hiding. I'd like to meet you. Let me know when/where to meet.
You've sparked me. I expect a reply.
keef.
"David Qunt" <IainMcLaren35@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns93C9BEEA6EB2DIainMcLaren35sdpamtw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "keef" <keef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> squirted these wordjisms deep inside the
> bumtube of the newstwat in news:bgbjj9$mm5$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Errrr ... it was very odd though!
> >
> > First time I'd seen it, can anyone enlighten me what the f*ck it was
> > all about? I loved TDT, I loved Brass Eye, I loved Blue Jam and I
> > loved Jam.
> >
> > But this, and the last Brass Eye special? Errr ... I prefer "Some
> > people say drink's a drug ... it's not a drug, it's a drink".
> >
> > Anyone? What's he been taking?
> >
> > keef
> >
> > "keef" <keef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:bg9cs0$lh6$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Great! Thanks for pointing this out, mate - I'd definitely have
> >> missed
> > it.
> >>
> >> "Andrew R. Gillett" <arg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >> message news:MPG.1990d45f18e55ca9897bb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > At 23:10
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Andrew Gillett http://argnet.fatal-design.com/
> >> >
> >> > UK videogame release dates at:
> >> > http://www.release-dates.co.uk/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> If you loved Blue Jam, then I'm surprised that you don't appear to know
> it was based on the Rothko monologues from Blue Jam. If you loved Jam,
> you'd also know that there was also a frame or two based on the Rothko
> monologues used in Jam. (the dog pulling the guy on a lead).
>
> It's in the format of 'short film', which are often puzzling as they
> don't really give time to explain why the story is being related - and
> that's part of their charm, in my opinion. Balance that against s so
many
> long films, which have to go to such lengths to set the scene and build
> up/explain convoluted plots, that by the end of it you wonder why they
> even bothered, and you may see what I mean.
>
> Would you prefer to see Morris making endless Brass Eye Specials,
> declining in quality each time, ad nauseam - or something new, and
> different?
>
> Jam looks much better to me watching it now than it did at the time, and
> I'm not alone in that point of view.
>
> --
> Iain McLaren
> *********************************
> > >A. Top posters
> > >Q. What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?
> ****************************************************
|
