On Sun, 18 May 2008 09:22:32 +0000 (UTC) nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Paul Ciszek)
wrote:
:>In article <husv24lrqpg8knpgcpt3sm3n6p0jqsabis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
:>Binyamin Dissen <postingid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>>On Fri, 16 May 2008 19:49:24 -0500 "ZBicyclist" <ZBicyclist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
:>>:>Looking at the last 30 years for guidance (since 1977 or so), what
:>>:>have we learned about what might or not work in foreign relations
:>>:>with Iran?
:>>:>Are they a huge threat, or do they want a nuclear weapon to have and
:>>:>hold, being surrounded by nuclear powers? (Pakistan, India, China,
:>>:>Russia, Israel, and the more distant but still close at hand U.S.)
:>>:>Forget Obama Bush and McCain for a moment. What would you do?
:>>Sand + heat = glass.
:>Is that your "final solution"?
Better their final solution than mine.
My people have much recent experience with folk like you at best looking
the
other way but sometimes even encouraging a "final solution" to my people.
--
Binyamin Dissen <bdissen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
|
