Re: Object

Greg Goss wrote:
> 
> Veronique <veroniqueunique@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> >On May 17, 3:52 pm, jeffinputnam <jeffinput...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Bill Turlock wrote:
> >> > (or symbol?)
> >>
> >> > Likely most here will identify this:
> >>
> >> >http://tinyurl.com/4zdsva
> >>
> >> This makes me feel very old. It's a hole insert for a 45rpm record.
> >>
> >> Sheesh. Next thing you know folks will be asking me to read the
frigging
> >> clocks for them.
> >>
> >> J
> >>
> >> (who misses real dial telephones)
> >
> >
> >
> >I've got my eye on a rotary phone from the 30s. There's a local guy
> >who rewires them so they'll plug into a regular jack and sells 'em for
> >about $90. Li'l bit steep, but what price love?
> 
> I had a dial phone with a crank on it in the eighties.  I think it was
> still in place when I sold the place.  There were eight attachment
> screws on it.  I never found a connection that would let it dial and
> still work right for talking and listening.  So I chose a setting that
> let me answer that phone, but dial out on other phones.
> 
> I never tried cranking it while connected.  I cranked it once when it
> wasn't connected to anything, and without at first noticing that my
> left hand was holding the phone down with my hand across the dynamo
> terminals.  Other than the chrome crank, the phone looked pretty
> normal.

You're sterile now, right?

Bill "I know I would be" Turlock no wait, I already am!