On Fri, 16 May 2008 07:03:20 -0700 (PDT), Rich T
<rich_tintera@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 16, 8:42 am, Peter Boulding <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 05:15:15 -0700 (PDT), Rich T
<rich_tint...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote in
>> <7cfaaebc-2a9a-4d57-88b2-c8b70de39...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>
>> >Now and then an anti-pot person will bring up the fact that today's
>> >weed is x% more powerful than yesterweed, like that's a bad thing.
>> >Just means less is needed to achieve the desired result, which for
>> >many is an agreeable buzz which is maintained by the occasional hit.
>> >Or so I've heard.
>>
>> Based on what's sold in this part of the world you've been misinformed.
>>
>> Quality has been sacrificed for the sake of strength (rather like those
dirt
>> cheap greenhouse-forced tomatoes that have bugger all taste). The
desired
>> result is often not achievable while psychoses requiring medical
treatment
>> are more common; sales volumes have declined.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Peter Boulding
>> p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(to e-mail, remove "UNSPAM")
>> Fractal music &
images:http://www.pboulding.co.uk/andhttp://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=794240&content=music
>
>I was referring to planet Earth, where weed induced psychoses aren't
>that common (at least in my sector).
All the others sort of psychoses are.
If anyone around here happens to have seeds from any of these favorite
plants and can write me off-list, I'd like to try a few garden
experiments. Otherwise I am out of the demographic for personal seed
collection and find them difficult to obtain.
Boron
|
