Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Cecil Adams > Re: One for the...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 40 Topic 22308 of 23404
Post > Topic >>

Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks

by huey.callison@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 14, 2008 at 12:40 AM

Snidely <Snidely.too@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 11, 2:52 pm, xhos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > How im****tant is the even coverage?  I'd be tempted to just make it
> > fly around at pseudo-random (or maybe depth-first systematically),
> > checking each non-checked square before entering it and remembering
> > the result for future use. That way it would cover all accessible
> > land regardless of the shape, although perhaps not evenly.
> I'd be tempted to just set it up as a random walk, choosing dir->next
> if dir-Owner !match.  And let it wind its own way through the plot,
> rather than manually moving it.  You only have to have it move one
> square at a time at some arbitrary interval ~= len(birdsong).  And why
> bother remembering?

Because if you remember, once you've found all the contiguous space, 
1) you no longer have to check, which makes the code more efficient, and 
2) (presumably) future objects can inherit the knowledge, so they don't  
   have to check either, which makes the whole environment more 
   efficient, and 
3) it makes the code ****table, because then anybody can start the object 
   in any space, and it'll find its own borders. If he hardcodes the 
   space it's allowed to go in, it only works in his space.

-- 
Huey
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-10 18:23:04 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
UaNeill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-10 10:33:01 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-11 01:12:21 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 02:20:50 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-11 15:30:04 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 00:34:41 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 01:24:38 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
spam.sc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 09:34:23 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-21 04:34:33 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-12 20:47:49 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
"Don K" <dk@  2008-05-10 14:35:57 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-11 15:36:15 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
"Don K" <dk@  2008-05-11 13:17:01 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 01:31:39 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
xhoster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 21:52:24 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-12 20:39:33 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
xhoster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-13 16:47:25 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Greg Goss <gossg@[EMAI  2008-05-13 22:23:09 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-14 06:31:58 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 01:40:34 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 01:50:25 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
ebenZEROONE@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-14 07:07:41 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-14 06:27:08 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 00:40:32 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-13 10:55:01 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Bob Ward <bobward@[EMA  2008-05-13 13:19:29 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Opus the Penguin <opus  2008-05-14 02:26:49 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-14 06:28:15 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 01:24:52 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-13 23:01:18 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 01:52:57 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-13 23:03:26 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 02:31:41 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 02:03:57 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-20 01:45:19 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
Snidely <Snidely.too@[  2008-05-20 12:21:44 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
xhoster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 19:42:30 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-21 05:12:16 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
huey.callison@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-21 01:56:55 
Re: One for the programmers or maths/logic geeks
John Hatpin <RemoveThi  2008-05-21 19:39:27 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 7:03:14 CDT 2008.