On May 12, 12:12=A0am, Mr C <camsoc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 11, 11:51=A0pm, Mary <mrfeath...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Lars Eighner wrote:
> > > This is who I think would be the smart picks for the candidates, not
w=
hom I
> > > sup****t necessarily.
>
> > > Obama: Richardson. =A0Part of the reason Obama has the nomination is
H=
illary's
> > > baggage. =A0Picking her would cut into one his of his main selling
poi=
nts
> > > (i.e. not being Hillary). =A0But he needs some of her base.
=A0Richard=
son gets a
> > > big part that easily could go Republican.
>
> > > McCain: Santorum. =A0Okay two main problems for McCain. =A0The
thought=
that this
> > > geezer is croakers and the nutcase right, worried that McCain is not
s=
o
> > > crazy as they are. =A0Santorum: young enough not to croak and nuts
as =
any
> > > rightwing wet dream (but below the radar of most swing voters).
>
> > Huh? =A0I thought everyone had heard of Santorum after the shenanigans
> > with the Dover Board of Ed.
>
> That Spoonerism guy from Capitol Steps (Bill Stausee, who died last
Uh, that's Bill Strauss.
> December) immortalized him thusly:
> "My stext nory is about that soo ess yenator from the state great of
> Sennsylpania: Sick Rantorum. The phomo-hobe. Butt a wozo. He's worse
> than Loctor Daura, Rat Pobertson, and Fairy Jalwell. ... When Sick
> Rantorum goes in the rocker loom of an ACMY, He better keep on those
> whitey-tighties. If anybody sees him nutt-baked, what if they fook a
> toto? His hiney little ****ney could be the stuvie mar of a flay gorno
> pick."
>
> Sister Me
|
