Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Cecil Adams > Re: Convert box...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 22292 of 23404
Post > Topic >>

Re: Convert box reviewed

by Bill Turlock <"Bill Turlock "@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 12:26 PM

Lars Eighner wrote:
> 
> Because there have been some questions here on the subject, here is a
review
> of one converter box I wrote for an Austin newsgroup.  Please excuse the
> lo-cal refs.
> 
> The converter boxes at the Beruit HEB which are free with government
coupon
> + less than $5 tax are labeled Philco model TB100HH9.  Googling for this
> model shows retail prices starting around $50.00 (before ****pping and
tax)
> and you can apparently pay even more for them if you want.  I don't
think
> Mr. Butts is losing money on these things, but he seems to be giving us
a
> break.
> 
> Overall rating: 4-1/2 Stars
> 
> Summary: This is just an excellent thing.  I probably would have been
> willing to pay some more money for this if I had been sure it would work
> this well.
> 
> I tested this box on a more-than-10-years-old RCA analog set and on the
> analog ****t of an 3-year-old Advent HD set.  I used Thompson model
ANT1020
> *unamplified* rabbit ears with loop in a marginal area (indoors, ground
floor
> apartment near Rundberg and I35.
> 
> The box looks like a piece of junk.  It has RF-in, RF-out, and
video-audio
> out (red, white, yellow RCA plugs).  RCA cables are not supplied, but a
> short length of snap-on coaxial (RF) cable is included.  The video-audio
out
> was not tested.  Output can be selected between analog channels 3 and 4.
RF
> passthrough can also be selected, which you almost certainly do not want
to
> do since Austin broadcasters are all broadcasting digital.  Box is
slightly
> thicker and shorter than a slimline PS2.  I don't think this box should
be
> mounted on top of most sets --- no brackets or mounting system is
supplied
> for this purpose, and I am guessing heat would be a consideration with
most
> analog sets.
> 
> Reception: reception with this box and unamplified rabbit ears was as
good
> or better than that of a three-year-old HD receiver with amplified
rabbit
> ears.  (Both require slight antenna vector tweaking to receive all
available
> channels in this marginal area: 7.1, 18.1, 18.2, 24.1, 24.2, 36.1, 42.1,
> 42.2, 54.1).
> 
> Connection:  It was hard to go wrong.  Connectors are on the back of the
box,
> clearly labeled and in the case of video-audio out, color coded.  AC
power
> plug is polarized, but not grounded.
> 
> Setup: Setup wizard works good, but you might want to run it yourself
before
> handing it your maiden aunt.
> 
> Features:
>      * V-chip (not tested)
>      * CC --- highly configurable, best I have seen
>      * Lanuage selection (of course depends on whether alternate audio
is
>      broadcast)
>      * Electronic Program Guide --- this is really the only flaw I
found.
> EPG is available to view schedule for current channel only.  There is no
> all-channels box grid.
>      * Aspect: choice of letterbox, zoom, and full screen.  Zoom loses
right
> and left ends of HD broadcasts and full screen bends to fit with the
> necessary distortion.  If you choose letterbox, you automagically get
full
> screen for non-HD digital subchannels (i.e. 18.2 "Create" and 42.2
"RTN").
> There is a warning about potential burn-in of letterbox bars, but it is
not
> clear to me that this will be a problem with recent CRTs.
>     * Audio volume:  no audio volume control on the box.  You have to
keep
> the set's remote handy (as well as for on-off of the set).
>     * Settings memory: box retained channels and other set up features
when
> unplugged and moved to another room.  Whether it will do so indefinitely
is
> not clear.
> 
> Picture:
> 
> Excellent, but of course you don't get HD (not even on the analog ****t
of an
> HD set --- this is *not* an HD receiver).  Color and brightness were too
> hot compared with analog antenna reception and required set adjustment.
> Unacceptable interference was discovered when the box was connected
through
> a game deck adapter (but this particular adapter was suspect, having
similar
> but less pronouced interference when used with an antenna connection).
> 
> Controls:
> 
> There are no on-box controls.  Everything this box can do is accessible
with
> the remote.  The on-screen menus are clear enough for anyone who has
used a
> computer to get through most tasks without consulting the instructions. 
For
> dummies, the channel up/down buttons are small and not in the intuitive
> place and the previous-channel button is very small.  I'm guessing you
are
> SOL if you lose the remote --- no attempt was made to determine if any
> "universal remote" can learn to use the box.  Remote takes 2 AA
batteries
> (included).
> 
> Negatives:
> 
> EPG is the biggest negative.  Channel up and down could be be bigger
buttons
> and in a more intuitive place.

TY
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Convert box reviewed
Lars Eighner <usenet@[  2008-05-09 13:18:51 
Re: Convert box reviewed
Bill Turlock <"Bi  2008-05-09 12:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 7:08:26 CDT 2008.