Re: Obama May Win Indiana

On Wed, 7 May 2008 17:48:27 -0700 (PDT), Dana <dcarpend@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On May 7, 9:58 am, Boron Elgar <boron_el...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 May 2008 08:02:32 -0500, sli...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> >>>or come so close it kills Clinton's chances.
>>
>> >> The huge difference in NC did that just as much.
>>
>> >Yep.  Everyone is focusing on Indiana because it was such a close
race,
>> >but in reality, the closeness of that race results in a one-delegate
****ft
>> >either way.
>>
>> >Meanwhile, his win in North Carolina A) increases his delegate total,
B)
>> >increases his popular vote totals, C) eliminates the gains Clinton
made by
>> >winning Pennsylvania, and D) gives Obama the popular vote lead even if
you
>> >count the disputed primaries in Michigan and Florida.
>>
>> >If this were a basketball game, there would be twenty seconds left and
>> >Obama just hit a three-pointer to bring his lead back up to 7.
>>
>> Indeed. This is the logical turning point for any superdelegates who
>> were on the fence.
>>
>> The trouble now is that there are a lot of sup****ters of each who do
>> not want to sup****t the other one. Pelosi has loudly come out against
>> a dynamic duo ticket, but I think it might be interesting.
>>
>> If Obama picks Richardson, it might help the ticket with Hispanics,
>> but even more racists will crawl out of the woodwork.
>>
>> So...who else might be an interesting choice for veep?
>>
>
>Jim Webb.

That guy from Dragnet?

-- 
Neal

* It's far more impressive when people discover your good 
qualities without your help.