M C Hamster <davolson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Wed, 7 May 2008 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT), Nasti J <njgillmom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>On May 6, 12:52 pm, M C Hamster <davol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> From today's VSL, this is just a really happy, nice video (filmed in
>>> one take).
>>
>>It was even better when Bobby Van did it 55 years ago. (and neither
>>one was done in one take)
>
>The Bobby Van one (that I did see yesterday but hadn't seen before)
>has several complete cuts of scene in it, but this one did quite a
>good job of masking the cuts. One commenter said he was a film
>student and didn't see where cuts could have been placed, and I got
>seduced by him and imagining it to be a single take. I thought it
>possible for Goldfrapp to even scoot from scene to scene just in time.
>Now I'm not quite as happy, knowing it wasn't one take.
That insanely long take behind the titles in "The Player" in 89 or so?
Was that really a single take, or just edited so well a civilian
couldn't catch it?
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27
|
