Re: Obama's Wright Thing

On Sat, 03 May 2008 14:59:24 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Guillermo el Gato <devnull@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 03 May 2008 08:00:04 -0400, Boron Elgar
>
>>>That has nothing do with it, either. What does a poll (taken when?)
>>>have to do with an election in November? It isn't as if Clinton  has
>>>tanked everywhere she's run, Hank. Either your poll is wrong or
>>>irrelevant. Get it?
>>
>>Assuming that Clinton wins in November, and that she actually takes
>>office in January, we're all going to have to get used to calling
>>Boron and her ilk the "True Believers" and undo the use of that term
>>from the likes of Bonde and Ravin' John.
>>
>>That's gonna be a real *****.
>
>I've gathered the impression that Boron's pretty pissed off at ALL of
>the current choices.  

You are correct.

>She just comes down on Obama because he has so
>many of us sup****ters on this newsgroup. 

You are correct.

>Countering specific points
>made by Obamanians means coming down on the Clinton side of most of
>the arguments. 

At time, yes.

> None of us are very loud about being McCain
>sup****ters, and most of the Obama sup****ters feel strongly about
>Clinton at the moment.
>
>It would be interesting to see if Boron would turn into a raven in a
>Clinton presidency.  I would expect not.

I don't like her politics/policies now (I like the health care) now,
so there would have to be quite a change for me to sup****t many of
them. Still, I don't like Clinton Rules and I don't like ***ism and I
will pounce on either when I see it.

Boron