On May 3, 4:53 pm, Dana <dcarp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 1, 8:29 pm, Les Albert <lalbe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 1 May 2008 23:02:28 +0000 (UTC), nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Paul
>
> > Ciszek) wrote:
>
> > >In article
<466a733b-b12b-4c23-aa8a-0c3ce130c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > <tlwrig...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > >>I used to be a Marlboro smoker, and yes, there is a definite
> > >>difference in the way brands taste. The old "Winston tastes good
like
> > >>a cigarette should" is a bunch of crap. Winstons always tasted
flat.
> > >>Kents were better (my FIL used to be a Kent smoker), but still not
as
> > >>good as the old red cowboy killers.
> > >I read somewhere that the original Marlboro man drown while riding
> > >a horse across an artificial pond for a photo shoot. Does anyone
> > >know if that really happened?
>
> > No, I remember reading that the original Marlboro man died of cancer.
>
> Also the Winston man, similarly macho-cowboy-esque. I read, years
> ago, that he re****ted asking the CEO of Winston-Salem why none of the
> tobacco company execs smoked. The answer was along the lines of "We
> defend the right to smoke for women, minorities, and the stupid."
I meant RJ Reynolds, of course. Duh.
|
