On Apr 11, 3:33 pm, Opus the Penguin <opusthepenguin+use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Dover Beach (moon.blanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> > Opus the Penguin <opusthepenguin+use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Mr C (camsoc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> >>> On Apr 10, 9:42 pm, Snidely <Snidely....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> On Apr 10, 6:07 pm, "Jim Beaver" <jumble...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>> > "Dover Beach" <moon.blanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>> > > variety of companies. I suspect Geico doesn't do Calif.
> >>>> > > homeowners so they have some deal to pass it on.
>
> >>>> > Heckuva lotta Geico commercials here, though. (SoCal)
>
> >>>> But it's for things that move, innit? They may not have the
> >>>> proper forms filed with the state insurance commissioner to do
> >>>> houses.
>
> >>> Too high risk for their taste? California: earthquakes,
> >>> landslides, wildfires, tidal waves, falling off into the sea,
> >>> that kind of thing.
>
> >> I wonder if California houses are actuarially at greater risk of
> >> catastrophes that require replacement or at least major
> >> renovation.
>
> > They were perfectly happy to consider insuring it as long as it
> > was owner-occupied, and the owner a human being rather than a
> > trust.
>
> I think you should have told them it was owner-occupied and that the
> trust occupies the house.
>
>
"I Know a House Where Trust Lives" -- hey, it's a country song!
|
