On Apr 11, 10:45 am, Mary <mrfeath...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 12:42 pm, Dover Beach <moon.blanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oy. I just called Farmers (the place was previously insured through
> > Farmers) and got an agent who is willing to give it the ol' college
try.
> > He, too, seemed to feel that it is necessary to have a human being as
> > the named insured, though he was also willing to wedge the trust's
name
> > into the relevant field. So I put a call in to my lawyer (not my
> > husband) and asked if I should be the named insured since I'm the
> > trustee. I really don't think my mom should be the named insured.
>
> I don't understand why they think a trust or other non-human being
> can't be a named insured. Companies are named insured all the time.
>
> I mean, these people are working in the insurance industry, shouldn't
> they know this stuff?
Lately, though, I've been runnning into this with businesses needing,
oh, a Post Office box: the USPS cannot give out post office boxes to a
business without naming on the contract the individuals who will be
receiving mail at said box. And credit cards: you must have a name on
the credit card, even if the business is incor****ated. There was one
other example in the past couple of weeks I've had where a business
was trying to get the business's name on the account, and an
individual's name was insisted upon. In the case of the PO Box, it
left me wondering who, from the local city staff, had their name on
the city's PO Box, since obviously anything addressed to "City of XYZ"
was received there.
V.
--
Veronique Chez Sheep
|
