Mr C (camsoccer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> On Apr 10, 9:42 pm, Snidely <Snidely....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 10, 6:07 pm, "Jim Beaver" <jumble...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > "Dover Beach" <moon.blanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > > variety of companies. I suspect Geico doesn't do Calif.
>> > > homeowners so they have some deal to pass it on.
>>
>> > Heckuva lotta Geico commercials here, though. (SoCal)
>>
>> But it's for things that move, innit? They may not have the
>> proper forms filed with the state insurance commissioner to do
>> houses.
>
> Too high risk for their taste? California: earthquakes,
> landslides, wildfires, tidal waves, falling off into the sea, that
> kind of thing.
>
I wonder if California houses are actuarially at greater risk of
catastrophes that require replacement or at least major renovation.
--
Opus the Penguin
This is so obviously ludicrous that it's hard to get very interested
in contradicting it. - Pushmi-Pullyu
|
