Re: NYT Op-Ed by Paul Krugman

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:02:40 -0700, Greg Goss <gossg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>M C Hamster <davolson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:27:57 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin
>><opusthepenguin+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>I don't think that's so. I don't want to get back into it. But there 
>>>was Whitewater, the disappearing Rose Law Firm files, the people who 
>>>went to jail to protect the Clintons, keeping the police out of Vince 
>>>Foster's office while they did clean up, etc. etc. You may discount 
>>>that evidence, but don't tell me I don't even have it. You are wrong.
>>
>>So what do you think of the Rezko (non) issue?   Doesn't that
>>similarly disqualify Obama?  He's really nothing better than a petty
>>crook.  (And a muslim to boot.)
>
>Except that there are photos of Bill and Hill with Rezko, too.


Are you insane? There is a photo taken at a Chicago fund raiser,
likely for Carol Mosely-Brown. There is no 17 year relation****p like
Obama has. There is a photo.

Hook, line and sinker. More blog-barf. 

Boron