Re: NYT Op-Ed by Paul Krugman

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:39:08 +0000 (UTC), Opus the Penguin
<opusthepenguin+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>M C Hamster (davolson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
>> Opus the Penguin <opusthepenguin+usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>
>>>I don't think that's so. I don't want to get back into it. But
>>>there was Whitewater, the disappearing Rose Law Firm files, the
>>>people who went to jail to protect the Clintons, keeping the
>>>police out of Vince Foster's office while they did clean up, etc.
>>>etc. You may discount that evidence, but don't tell me I don't
>>>even have it. You are wrong. 
>> 
>> So what do you think of the Rezko (non) issue?   Doesn't that
>> similarly disqualify Obama?  He's really nothing better than a
>> petty crook.  (And a muslim to boot.)
>> 
>
>It looks mildly suspicious, I suppose. If it turns out that Obama 
>profited greatly and he's stonewalling an investigation, I'll 
>probably get concerned. Won't you?

Probably not much, unless it really affects his ability to be
president.   Which it might if the opposition successfully turns it
into a major issue.  

Most of these personal financial scandals don't do a lot for me...
it's the constitutional ones that bother me since those relate to
being president.  

Is my being from Chicago relevant?

-- 
M C Hamster  "Big Wheel Keep on Turning" -- Creedence Clearwater Revival