Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Bruce Campbell > Re: Bruce Campb...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 77 of 146
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bruce Campbell - Tarnsman of Gor

by "Dreamer" <dreamer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 29, 2005 at 08:58 PM

<lensman1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1112094628.712362.289240@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> David Johnston wrote:
> > On 24 Mar 2005 09:18:50 -0800, lensman1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Dreamer wrote:
> > >> <lensman1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >> news:1111602077.242260.327270@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >> > Actually, they weren't that bad. Sort of "hard core" Edgar Rice
> > >> > Burroughs-Mars stuff. What got to me was the hypocricy. (sp)
> > >>
> > >> There isn't any hypocracy if you also realize that the books are
> > >perfectly
> > >> consistent in the general case of the specific observation you
> make
> > >below:
> > >> the assertion that men and women are fundamentally different.
> Whether
> > >you
> > >> believe it or not is another question, but it's not fair to call a
> > >book
> > >> hypocritical in one breath and make fun of it for endlessly
> repeating
> > >the
> > >> same message with the next.
> > >
> > >I never said he was inconsistent. I think the basic message (men
> will
> > >work together to free themselves, women will work against each
> other.
> > >Women will be happiest when they learn to be subservient to man) is
> > >hypocritical.
> >
> > It isn't.  Given the premise (that the "natural order" is men on top,
> > and women on their knees), there's no hypocrisy involved in saying
> > that slavery is bad for men and good for women.  It might be
> > considered pernicious, but not hypocritical.
>
> But there is the concept of "men will work together to help each other,
> women will betray potential trust and sell each other into slavery."

Actually there are trustworthy women and dastardly men in the Gor books:
you
are correct in that they ascribe different psychological traits to men and
women but incorrect as to what they are.

> But, y'know what? Maybe you're right and I'm using the wrong term. But
> it's still a nasty-ass series of propaganda pieces for a nasty
> mysogonist (sp) mind. I'd love to see a fanfic of Xena wandering around
> Gor kicking their collective asses.

There are any number of such fanfics but a Google away. I think my
favorite
so far has been one in which Gandalf, Rayden, and some others (including I
think the Guardians of Oa) were part of some sort of council of
trans-dimensional beings who tried to put the kibosh on the Marty Sam (A
"Marty Sam" is a male "Mary Sue.") uber-wizard going to Gor to help some
Terrans who'd been kidnapped and taken there: he mannishly defies them and
equips the ragged band with weapons and powers from various videogames.
Hilarity ensues.

Probably the best suggestion I've seen for a crossover which would teach
Tarl Cabot some humility is to sic Gwen Ingolfsson on him. Absent massive
Authorial Intervention, she'd clean his clock. Xena wouldn't be a
particularly bothersome problem.

M

-><-
Non curo. Si metrum non habet, non est poema.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Bruce Campbell - Tarnsman of Gor
lensman1955@[EMAIL PROTEC  2005-03-29 03:10:28 
Re: Bruce Campbell - Tarnsman of Gor
"Dreamer" <d  2005-03-29 20:58:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 17:53:28 CDT 2008.