Dreamer wrote:
> <lensman1955@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1111602077.242260.327270@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Actually, they weren't that bad. Sort of "hard core" Edgar Rice
> > Burroughs-Mars stuff. What got to me was the hypocricy. (sp)
>
> There isn't any hypocracy if you also realize that the books are
perfectly
> consistent in the general case of the specific observation you make
below:
> the assertion that men and women are fundamentally different. Whether
you
> believe it or not is another question, but it's not fair to call a
book
> hypocritical in one breath and make fun of it for endlessly repeating
the
> same message with the next.
I never said he was inconsistent. I think the basic message (men will
work together to free themselves, women will work against each other.
Women will be happiest when they learn to be subservient to man) is
hypocritical. But that's me. I don't know if woss'isface had anything
to do with the one movie I saw, but there was also hypocrisy since the
entire movie preached the opposite of the books!
