parris_k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On 31 Jan, 15:44, Wolfie <Wolfie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'sBoy.org> wrote:
>> parri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>> On 31 Jan, 14:44, Wolfie <Wolfie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'sBoy.org> wrote:
>>>> parri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>> On 31 Jan, 14:27, Wolfie <Wolfie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'sBoy.org> wrote:
>>>>>> parri...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>> On 31 Jan, 13:24, Wolfie <Wolfie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
'sBoy.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' ) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> B1ackwater wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Bill Bonde ( 'Hi ho' )" <tributyltinpa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23434850-details/Flight+to...
>>>>>>>>>>> #begin quote
>>>>>>>>>>> The co-pilot of a Heathrow-bound plane was dragged kicking and
screaming
>>>>>>>>>> >from the cockpit after suffering a mental breakdown while in
control of
>>>>>>>>>>> the flight.
>>>>>>>>>>> He began yelling and "invoking God" as the Air Canada 767 flew
at 37,000
>>>>>>>>>>> feet over the Atlantic. He was held down by other crew members
and a
>>>>>>>>>>> passenger, a member of the Canadian armed forces.
>>>>>>>>>>> The co-pilot then had restraints fastened to his wrists and
ankles and
>>>>>>>>>>> was handcuffed to a seat. The flight from Toronto made an
emergency
>>>>>>>>>>> landing in Shannon and the co-pilot, who had been crying and
screaming
>>>>>>>>>>> according to witnesses, was taken off the plane.
>>>>>>>>>>> He was taken by ambulance to a psychiatric ward where he is
being
>>>>>>>>>>> treated for a suspected nervous breakdown.
>>>>>>>>>>> The 146 passengers on the overnight flight continued their
journey and
>>>>>>>>>>> got to Heathrow eight hours behind schedule after the drama on
Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>> Passenger Sean Finucane told of his shock as he witnessed the
co-pilot
>>>>>>>>>>> being carried out of the cockpit in restraints.
>>>>>>>>>>> He said today: "He was very, very distraught. He was yelling
loudly at
>>>>>>>>>>> times. When they tried to put his shoes on later he swore and
he
>>>>>>>>>>> threatened people. His voice was clear so he didn't sound
drunk or
>>>>>>>>>>> anything. He was swearing and was very distressed."
>>>>>>>>>>> Mr Finucane, from Lanca****re, told how the pilot kept
shouting: "I need
>>>>>>>>>>> to talk to you God."
>>>>>>>>>> RADical man ...
>>>>>>>>>> But then I guess any high-pressure profession suffers
>>>>>>>>>> from a dispro****tionate number of mental breakdowns.
>>>>>>>>>> Just hope it doesn't happen to your doctor when he's
>>>>>>>>>> transplanting a kidney or something :-)
>>>>>>>>> Al Qaeda put some LSD in his coffee.
>>>>>>>> Yeah but it sounds startlingly like that Air Egypt plane that
>>>>>>>> was piloted into the sea after leaving the US. Pilot was
>>>>>>>> also raving.
>>>>>>> Your proof for this being?
>>>>>> Its a matter of record.
>>>>> No, it's a matter of record that people have SAID he was barking.
>>>>> It being named as the cause of the crash (or even being a fact)
isn't.
>>>>> Not by a long stretch:
>>>>> http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2002/aab0201.htm
>>>>>> http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200111/langewiesche
>>>>> An opinion piece is "proof"?
>>>> Wow. You're like the guy speeding through the neighborhood
>>>> who runs down a cat and then claims the cat committed suicide.
>>>> Wait here, we'll try to find its note.
>>> That's yuor answer to the question "an opinion piece is proof?" ?
>>>>>> I am curious to know why you asked?
>>>>> I'm just a stickler for accuracy..
>>>> If you have a rebuttal of the CVR transcript as contained in
>>>> the item above, lets have it.
>>> It's the interpretation of teh CVR rather than what is on it that is
>>> interesting.
>>> But as long as you recognise you have no proof, only interpretation of
>>> evidence...
>> You are just babbling here.
>
> Not at all. I'm trying to show you the difference between proof and
> evidence.
> You claimed you had proof.
>
>> Offer some factual rebuttal
>> of the CVR and flight recorders technical data that
>> shows that you have any vestiges of credibility on this
>> topic.
>
> I'm not the one claiming that it has been "proven" that the co-pilot
> was "raving" by citing an opinion piece.
>
> I have already referred you to the _factual_ re****t on the crash.
Oh grow up.
Here's the same thing from atsb - your link which Langewiesche
wrote about:
The National Trans****tation Safety Board determines that the probable
cause of the EgyptAir flight 990 accident is the airplane's departure
from normal cruise flight and subsequent impact with the Atlantic Ocean
as a result of the relief first officer's flight control inputs. The
reason for the relief first officer's actions was not determined.
Except that he was the one that pushed the craft into a steep dive,
and switched off the gas while shouting "I rely on God, I rely on
God" and failed to help the desperate first officer who
tried to pull the plane up.
Moron.
--
Wolfie
|
