Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > British-accent > Re: Ummmmm?
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 36 Topic 513 of 567
Post > Topic >>

Re: Ummmmm?

by Sarah Eggleston <sarah_n@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 24, 2006 at 11:25 AM

Michael wrote:
> joseph.hutcheon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> 
>>Michael wrote:
>>
>>>kd***ton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>

>>>Yup, CA real estate is nuts indeed  I too feel it's a pretty lousy deal
>>>for young people starting out who are doomed to renting because of the
>>>high cost of owning property. Of course back country property is
>>>generally cheaper, but still no bargain and the cost of fuel being what
>>>it is that's a tough go as well.
>>
>>The UK press has run several re****ts about how the US real estate
>>business is cra****ng and burning, house prices plummeting etc.
>>Presumably this is just newspaper hype?
> 
> 
> I think it's more correct to say that at least in SoCal the market has
> flattened out and and making a gentle downward correction.  Since many
> continue to want to come to where the sun ****nes most of the time, I
> don't look for the market to really make any hard landings.  In fact, a
> slight drop in mortgage interest rates caused housing starts to
> increase modestly last month.
> 
The way I heard it, the Florida house market is cra****ng and burning - 
that's the part of the US that UK buyers are most exposed to. I could 
believe that some UK journalists extrapolated Florida -> US. It's the 
same thing, no? [1]

>>Such a house price crash in the UK would certainly the only way my
>>children would be able to afford to buy property!
> 
> Right, that's a sad truth.  Although my son has a very good job, the
> best he can manage ATM is a rather large mobile home/carvan.  Of course
> a really sharp crash would have negative consequences for the economy
> since real estate is such a major market component.  How about all
> those folks left holding the bag who bought high and financed with
> negative amortization loans who'll just walk away and default on these
> contracts?  Crash of 29 revisited?  Some of the real doomsayers paint a
> similarly dire picture, but I don't feel that's really in the cards,
> IMHO.

I agree, it doesn't look like another big crash in my crystal ball at 
the moment. After a couple of years of going sideways, I hear rumours 
that the UK market is picking up again. Possibly the latest banking 
initiatives (mortgages that can be shared between up to 4 individuals) 
have contributed to this phenomenon.

Although of course, I'm not a qualified soothsayer, and some pundits 
predict a 50-60 year cycle between big crashes (just long enough that 
everyone's forgotten), so YMMV.

-Sazz

[1] Ooo, an op****tunity for revenge on the Sweden/Switzerland 
Vienna/Venice sagas.
 




 36 Posts in Topic:
Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-14 22:12:53 
Re: Ummmmm?
Stuart Rogers <stuart.  2006-10-15 18:45:12 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-16 00:42:53 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-15 19:39:39 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-15 19:41:14 
Re: Ummmmm?
kdsexton@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-10-17 04:32:25 
Re: Ummmmm?
kdsexton@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-10-18 05:15:40 
Re: Ummmmm?
"lardychap" <  2006-10-28 13:41:29 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-30 02:30:03 
Re: Ummmmm?
Ken Butler <ken@[EMAIL  2006-11-10 17:15:32 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-18 16:30:28 
Re: Ummmmm?
kdsexton@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-10-20 05:21:19 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-18 16:35:28 
Re: Ummmmm?
kdsexton@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-10-20 05:05:30 
Re: Ummmmm?
joseph.hutcheon@[EMAIL PR  2006-10-19 04:15:04 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-20 12:10:50 
Re: Ummmmm?
Stuart Rogers <stuart.  2006-10-20 19:41:11 
Re: Ummmmm?
The Odd Stray <don't_s  2006-10-23 02:36:32 
Re: Ummmmm?
Sarah Eggleston <sarah  2006-10-24 11:25:54 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-24 21:51:31 
Re: Ummmmm?
Stuart Rogers <stuart.  2006-10-24 21:07:17 
Re: Ummmmm?
Calum <com.gmail@[EMAI  2006-10-25 00:10:00 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-25 23:12:59 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-20 12:25:56 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-20 12:32:57 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-23 15:25:28 
Re: Ummmmm?
The Odd Stray <don't_s  2006-10-24 05:14:02 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-23 15:28:16 
Re: Ummmmm?
"lardychap" <  2006-10-25 11:35:25 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-25 23:18:12 
Re: Ummmmm?
"lardychap" <  2006-10-25 11:58:44 
Re: Ummmmm?
Sarah Eggleston <sarah  2006-10-26 17:25:12 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-25 15:14:05 
Re: Ummmmm?
"Michael" <s  2006-10-25 15:24:37 
Re: Ummmmm?
"lardychap" <  2006-10-27 11:24:39 
Re: Ummmmm?
nowhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-10-27 22:05:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Sep 5 0:25:19 CDT 2008.