Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Bob Larson > Re: Moe and Ken...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 21 Topic 1911 of 2225
Post > Topic >>

Re: Moe and Kent need help

by forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 02:28 PM

On May 11, 6:19=A0am, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:31:58 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
>
>
>
>
>
> <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Apr 25, 1:04=A0pm, snickers <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:32:33 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan wrote:
> >> > On Apr 24, 5:04=A0pm, snickers <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:18:13 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan wrote:
> >> >>> On Apr 21, 12:27=A0pm, snickers <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>>> The challenge is for either of you to open a Skype account and
the=
n accept
> >> >>>> the spiritual counsel I can offer. Are you two willing to face
up =
to your
> >> >>>> demons and cast tem aside? Post your user ids and a tiem to call
a=
nd I'll
> >> >>>> bring spiritual healing to you.
>
> >> >>> BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
>
> >> >>> =A0Like Bob Larson =A0did to Donna in the cemetery?
Surrreeeeee....=
...
>
> >> >>> =A0I suggested a Yahoo chat room. You backed down.
>
> >> >>> =A0An anonymous coward is hardly one to dictate " spiritual
counsel=
".
> >> >>> Particularly after you so love a despicable sinner like Bob
Larson.=

> >> >>> And the fact that I am not a Christian means that whatever "
spirit=
ual
> >> >>> counsel" you would " offer" would be irrelevant to me. And Kent
Wil=
ls,
> >> >>> being a Christian, has his minister to counsel him so he doesn't
ne=
ed
> >> >>> you.
>
> >> >>> =A0The only " counsel" I need right now is how to take care of
two
> >> >>> kittens, including trying to get a JRT to NOT hurt them. "
Counseli=
ng"
> >> >>> from a psycopath predator is a bull**** lure for said predator to
> >> >>> attack.
>
> >> >>> Moe
> >> >>> =A0Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> >> >>> " A vampire cop? REALLY?"
> >> >>>http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
> >> >> You need help young lady.
>
> >> >> Either accept my offer and use a skype chat room or keep on being
> >> >> surrounded by demons.
>
> >> >> Yes or no, you make the decision.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > =A0Chatroom yes.
>
> >> > On Yahoo, not skype.
>
> >> They have fixed any problems Moe, stop lying.
>
> > I'm not using Skype, Bobbie. I noted other reasons why you are so
> >damn eager to try to con me to uses Skype, mainly your usual cowardice
> >in staying anonymous.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0I don't think snickers is Lar$on. =A0It's possible, of
course, =
but
> I doubt it.
> =A0 =A0 =A0I think it's our old pal David playing games.

 I think it's Bobbie. The posts were deliberately limitied to the BL
newsgroup, the recent trifeckta ( spelling?) of turdish disasters BL
recently went through ( the " Stanley" exorcism, the cancellation of "
Real Exorcist" and the " Paranomal Preacher's interview with Donna,
one of BL's victims-- you can hear the  " Stanley" and Donna ones on
YouTube) added with me announcing these things no doubt made Bobbie a
little pissed off. The pressuring tatctic of a limited time line to
act and certain secuity problems associated with Skype ( which he
would use to remain anonymous while at the same time have some program
to gain access through our computers under the VOIP ****ts) had me
highly suspecting that this was a trap. It felt strongly of a set-up.

David would go so far as to toss out a few Christian phrases such as "
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Chirst" while snickers seems to have an
aversion to mentioning Jesus Christ ( kinda like a supposedly demon-
possessed person, in fact) while praising Bob Larson as if he was a
god in human flesh ( which would fit Bobbies egotism). I rather doubt
David could stand that for very long.

 And snickers and KSIC-O have certain attitudes and phrases in common.

>
>
>
> > May I also add that this has been the longest period you've stayed
> >posting so far. IOW this is suspciously very im****tant to you.
> >Personally I don't care if I talk to you or not, but your little con
> >game here makes me wonder what you are REALLY up to.
>
> > It's no secret that Bob Larson would love to silence Ken, Kent and
> >myself.
>
> =A0 =A0 Meh... =A0You and I were pretty minor in bringing down Lar$on's
sc=
am
> operation. =A0Yes, we each played our part, but the guy Lar$on really
> wants is Ken.

 But Ken isn't posting much online these days. And while we were not
active in bringing down Bobbie, I'm pretty sure in my case I've been
an annoyance to BL for some time. Bob knows what Ken looks like. You
and I, on the other hand, could be anybody in one of his "
conferences". My call on " Coast to Coast" showed Bobbie I could pop
up and expose him at any give op****tunity. As such, with his apparent
income in the past few years dwindling more and more, I think BL is
looking for someone to blame his increasing failures on and we're it
for now.

>
> >You as KSIC-O have pulled a few things in the past to try to
> >lure me for some ulterior motive ( log books in my own handwriting,
> >for example), so I highly suspect this is also the case here.
>
> > I made the offer first, Bobbie. It's Yahoo or no deal. I am not going
> >to use Skype. I'm no fool Bobbie and you should realize that by now.
> >The risk for me is far greater than for you at Skype, as you would not
> >be immediately held accountable for whatever sneaky crap you are
> >planning. On yahoo, if you try some ****, you will be held
> >accountable.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0I wouldn't be worried about it, since I have plenty of
security=

> measures in place. =A0Yes, it's *possible* someone could get past them,
> but not real likely. =A0
> =A0 =A0 =A0I'm not im****tant enough for someone who could to bother. =A0
I=
f
> they can do it, they'll be more interested in cor****ate machines.

 Kent, revenge is a pretty good motive. If Bob was pissed off at us
and if he is a psycopath as Ken and I suspect ( Bob at tleast as no
conscience--witness what he did to Donna), BL would take ANY
op****tunity to try to get back at us. He wants us silenced and he
might think we have things in our computers about him that might
expose him for good.  He might even think of trying to pass keystroke
loggers to see whatever we type before he or whomever he's using to do
this will nuke our computers. It's within the level of possibility and
considering how many damnfools are Branch Larsonians, he could find
one who has some hacking experience todo this for him, or he might try
script kiddieing it himself.

 The timing and the demands are suspiciously Larsonish.

>
>
>
>
>>http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Skype-closes-scripting-holes-i...=

>
> >> Skype closes scripting holes in Windows client
>
> > Uh huh. And Microsoft says Vista is compatable with older computers
> >and is so much better than XP.
>
> =A0 =A0 As a user of Vista, I can personally attest to the fact that
Vista=

> isn't backwards compliant with a lot of software.

 Yeah I head about that. It's one of the many reasons I am reluctant
to use Vista. It looks neat but you can make XP look like that with
certain programs.

> =A0 =A0 I can't play any Delta Force games below five with Vista. =A0I
was=

> able to play them all with XP. =A0My Star Wars Rouge Squadron game (my
> favorite of the SW games) is useless with Vista.

 I like the original SW Dark Forces game. I'm a big FPS type.

 Yeah, another reason not to get Vista. I have a lot of older computer
games I like to play with. And very few of the new computer games I've
seen interest me anymore. Lego Indiana Jones looks interesting. You
should try Lego Star Wars.



> =A0 =A0 Old WIN 3.1 apps that I used (I was comfortable with them and
they=

> worked) with XP won't run at all with Vista.

No surpise there, sadly. MicroBorg doesn't pass the bloatware out to
the buyer with consideration of compatability with older software.
That's why some folks are getting Macs or using Linux.


>
>
>
> > Bear in mind, Bobbie, that I occasionally read 2600 magazne. I looked
> >through a few issues and found a few interesting things about Skype.
> >Also I've been involved with computers ever since I had a 486 DX
> >computer. And I'm an avid reader of true crime books. In this case, I
> >smell something fishy iin what you're doing.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0If a Branch Larsonian is involved, you can be certain there's
> something fishy going on.

It was a lure to get us within range. Even I could see that. The whole
thing had this hinky feeling of a set-up.


>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sorry Bobbie, I don't trust you one damn bit. It's Yahoo or a similar
> >CHAT client, not an VOIP.
>
> >> > I made the challenge first, Bobbie, years ago,
> >> > and that is still valid.
>
> >> This isn't grade school young lady , I will host an open chat on
Skype =
next
> >> week, you can either show up or not.
>
> > Oh an ultimatum, is it Bobbiekins? Also a way out for you as usual.
> > What was it you told me about "my" " demands"?
>
> > Sorry Bobbie. I don't bow to YOUR schedule. My life does not revolve
> >around you.
>
> > Nice time limit. What's the hurry, Bobbiekins?
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0Those reservations at The Disney Yacht Club hotel aren't
going =
to
> be held forever :)

 More like he was impatient to get us as soon as possible. It's a
pressure tactic Bob used  from time to time on Talk Back.
Unfortunately for him he sorely underestimated me.

 Had this been a legitimate offer of a conference or other
conversation thing, he would have posted his phone number. I could
have set up a dispsable-type cell phone account or used a prepaid
phone card and called him one on one.

But a cell phone number would have been a way to expose snicker's true
identity. Snickers prizes his anonymity too much to risk doing
something on the level.

>
>
>
> >> But I will be there.
>
> > Have fun with yourself, Bobbie.
>
> >> All are welcome to partake.
>
> > Who the hell uses " partake" anymore? Jeez, you've been reading those
> >crappy romance novels?
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0Branch Larsonians only read account statements of those
they've=

> fleeced.

 And I get the feeling that Bobbie's fleecing prospects have dwindled
considerably in the last four years.  Two gated mansions, expensive
cars and a trophy wife with teenage daughters on the verge of being
hellions takes a lot of money to maintain.


Moe
 Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
>
> --
> Vegetarian: =A0Indian word for lousy hunter.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 




 21 Posts in Topic:
Moe and Kent need help
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 10:27:21 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:45:24 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-23 20:33:38 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-11 06:06:35 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-11 06:00:33 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-23 20:18:13 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 15:04:10 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-11 06:07:46 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 22:32:33 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:04:37 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-26 12:31:58 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-11 06:19:06 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-26 14:22:49 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-11 14:28:10 
Snickers scared of being identified
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 05:56:06 
Re: Snickers scared of being identified
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 15:01:58 
Re: Snickers scared of being identified
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 22:30:37 
Re: Snickers scared of being identified
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:21:08 
Bob wants me to play with his balls
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-27 15:31:15 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-28 13:56:55 
Re: Moe and Kent need help
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-11 05:57:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:27:56 CST 2008.