Re: Kent makes excuses for a ""theoretical"" bad act

KW > Or are you just admiring me?
KW > I know, I know.
KW > You're lying via innuendo once again.
KW >=A0It's SOP for you, GregWhore Hanson.

G > You're hurting my feelings, you garage burglar you!

Kent makes excuses for a ""theoretical"" bad act
   93 Greegor  Apr 29 (above)
      ot alt.sup****t.child-protective-services
            94 Dan Sullivan  Apr 30
[ Dan did his usual intellectual thing ]
G > Hi Dan!

KW >  Are you so detached from reality that
KW > you think Dan and I are the same person?

G > Have you asked Dan how well he likes that idea?  LOL

KW > I asked you a question.  If answering it is
KW > too difficult, so be it.

G > I post a message saying " Hi Dan! " and
G > you pretend I'm addressing you?

KW > You wrote the subject, simpleton.

G > Then you posture that I'm being evasive?

KW > It's the truth.

Speaking of something you know nothing about?

G > Hardcore winning strategy, right?

>     You chose the subject, which is, "Ping Kent Wills."  Since that's
> my nym, you must have wanted my attention.  You then write, "Hi Dan!"
> in the body.
>     Once again you prove your mind operates at about the level of the
> average nine to 10-year-old.
>     I ask you about it and rather than answer, you try to deflect
> attention.  Again.

Asked and answered with quotes and links.

>     You make it very obvious your intellectual level is too low to
> handle the simplest of concepts, at least on-line.  Perhaps you should
> work on doing whatever it is you need to do in order for Lisa and her
> daughter to be re-united.
>      It's a thought.

Speaking of something you know nothing about?