Re: Kent makes excuses for a ""theoretical"" bad act

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:30 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>A.
>Moe > As I said before, there were hints in the posts
>Moe > to analize and the list of suspects is small.
>
>G > So you pretend your "round up the usual suspects"
>G > logic is proof of something?
>
>KW > By YOUR standards, yes.
>
>What standards did Moe use when she wrote exhibit A above?
>

    She used honest examination.

>G > Kent has mentioned this ""death threat""
>G > over and over so many times because he
>G > sees it as serving his purposes.
>
>KW > Actually, YOU are the one who keeps
>KW > mentioning them.  Outside of your sick
>KW > interest in one of my 11 or 12 year-old
>KW > (I don't actually know her age) female
>KW > students, my infant daughter and a
>KW > friend's baby girl, it's been VERY
>KW > im****tant to you.
>KW > I don't believe you had any part in
>KW > Jonezie's racist posts, since you and
>KW > I weren't aware the other existed at the
>KW > time.  However, I do have to wonder
>KW > why you have devoted the amount
>KW > of time you have to the posts.
>
>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tO2J8xIAAAD-FV_7I-6E0McpeoqRe5_P8rhlH0Pnl47z4AZhN98BFg
>

     Wow.  I post to Usenet.

>G > This sup****ts the idea that Kent
>G > himself might have faked the message.
>
>KW > Pretending I did post them, GregWhore,
>KW > you have been posting for years with
>KW > all jets firing in service to YOUR interests.
>KW > It's odd you'd think it a bad thing to do.
>
>Making excuses for ""theoretical"" bad acts?
>

    No.  Exposing your hypocrisy isn't making excesses.

>KW > Or are you just admiring me?
>KW > I know, I know.
>KW > You're lying via innuendo once again.
>KW > It's SOP for you, GregWhore Hanson.
>
>You're hurting my feelings, you garage burglar you!

     According to you, I'm an actor and ESL teacher.  Since you didn't
state you posted the probate court information regarding Kent T. Wills
in error, you MUST think I am he.
     As far as I know, he's never been arrested for, let alone charged
with any burglary.  If you have evidence to the contrary, post it.
     If you wish, you may admit you've been lying.  I'll accept
either.


http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me.
   -- GregWhore Hanson
Message-ID: <1150922197.475392.294570@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>