Re: Still no link to ""racial death threat"" post

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:21:43 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

[...]

>>      I've made no such acknowledgment.
>>      I have stated that it's possible tjab's hints that he authored
>> them, framing Jonezie in doing so, is unlikely, but not impossible.  I
>> think he's been lying, since he's taken to posting nothing but lies.
>>      I have asked him to offer evidence that sup****ts his claim that
>> it was someone other than Jonezie.  You'll note he's offered none.
>>     100% of the evidence shows Jonezie authored the posts.
>
>If you traced it to jonezie and are so certain, how could
>you then allow that "it's possible" that tjab did it?

     When did I claim that *I* traced them?
     Hint:  I didn't.
     Why are you LYING and claiming I did.

     Regarding tjab, it is possible he was able to do such a great job
of forging that he managed to get 100% of the evidence to prove it was
Jonezie.  It is possible, however unlikely.
     I still think he was lying when he implied he wrote them.
     Note he's offered NOTHING to sup****t his claim that the evidence
is in anyway wrong.

>
>G > But that was not the challenge.
>
>G > The challenge was to produce a link to the ""racial death
>threats".
>
>G > Where is it?
>
>KW > Already posted.  Why are you LYING and claiming it's not?
>
>G > Why is it you posted assertions about these
>G > "racial death threats" over and over again,
>G > with no links, even told a story about how
>G > ""your friend"" traced the offending message,
>G > but when asked many times you have
>G > NOT produced the link to the original
>G > "racial death threats" post you've talked
>G > up so much?
>
>G > Where is the original "racial death threats" post, Kent?
>
>KW > I've already posted a link.  Why, exactly,
>KW > are you LYING and claiming I didn't?
>
>G > It's really YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to
>G > back up your accusations with proof.
>
>KW > And I did so.
>
>You sure do go to a trouble to AVOID posting
>any link to where the ""racial death threats""
>were made.

    And yet I posted a link to one of them.
    Odd that.
    Given that you've been devoting so much time to reading past posts
on alt.friends, I'm confident you saw the one he posted there, even
without the link.
    No, I can't PROVE you read it, but it's far more likely than not.

>
>G > Got a message header and a link to the offending post?
>
>KW > Yep.  Several, actually.
>
>G > Not just racial insult but ""racial death threat"", Kent.
>G > Where is it?
>
>KW > Already posted.  Since you are devoting time that
>KW > could be spent doing things in real life to reading
>KW > all of my posts, I'm confident you've seen the link.
>KW > Why are you LYING and claiming I didn't post it?
>
>I've asked you for the link many times.

    And I've asked you for a link to the fictional picture of David
dressed as a Nazi, doing the Nazi salute.
    I'm still waiting.
    The difference is I posted a link.  You aren't able, since the
photo doesn't exist.

>Your stooge Moe posted all kinds of OTHER links.
>When I ask if you've got a link all you say is yes.

     Actually, I posted a link to one of them.

>But over and over you refuse to post the link.

     Liar.

>Considering you have talked up the ""racial death threats"
>over and over again, but you refuse to post the link
>to allow anybody beside ""your friend"" to trace it,
>it's fairly obvious that you tried a "sympathy ploy"
>based on a lie.

    That you claim this is 100% iron clad PROOF that the opposite is
the truth.  Especially in light of the LIE you present in the
following paragraph.

>
>Another reason I think this ""racial death threat""
>is a fiction is that your first excuse when I started
>asking was that it had been deleted from newsgroups.
>

    I made no such claim, liar.

>It's well known in ascps among other newsgroups
>that even when deleted, messages are not really
>deleted.   Google is basically the only newsgroup
>source that honors a "cancel".

    Since I've never claimed they were deleted, your point is moot.

>
>The newsgroup services you use, for example, Kent, do not.

     I've never tried to issue a cancel with the server I'm using, so
I have no idea if they would honor one or not.


http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me.
   -- GregWhore Hanson
Message-ID: <1150922197.475392.294570@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>