"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:895e9b90-2394-425f-b3a9-616a59227058@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Who started accusing whom of being a stalker?
Who made it thier life's mission to hunt down every iota of information
about others that they could and post it publicly, whether correct or not?
>
> For months now the only accusations of "stalker"
> have been an idiotic campaign by Kent Wills
> and stooges (including Betty) to call me a stalker.
By your own difinition, you are a stalker.
--
<Greg Hanson>
"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me. "
>
> It's been said in reaction to various things that
> Kent and his stooges DO NOT LIKE.
> That is NOT what makes something stalking.
>
> Kent claims to be Polish.
> Kent makes a PUBLIC statement about his "romani" ethnicity.
> Kent falsely asserts that "gypsy" is a slur by itself.
> Kent claims to be Welsh Romani.
>
> When I asked about this incompatible ping-pong,
> TNKev asserts I am a stalker.
>
> You KNOW that questioning a PUBLIC statement
> is NOT stalking.
>
> And to address the message thread title,
> I'd like to again point out that Kent has
> denied his Felony conviction despite
> ample verifiable evidence that it is him.
>
> Kent has no legal right against me posting
> links to his public criminal and court records.
> Posting those public records is NOT stalking.
>
> Kent and stooges keep asserting it anyway.
>
> Questioning a public statement is NOT stalking.
> Posting criminal records is NOT stalking,
> especially where somebody made PUBLIC denials
> of a Felony conviction.
>
> Asking Kent if his "cor****ation" as he has publicly
> termed it, is incor****ated, LLC or "Family Trust"
> is not stalking. Kent BLABBED it up publicly.
>
> Which form of incor****ation is it Kent?
>
> If you make me investigate the "cor****ation"
> status, that ALSO will not be stalking.
>
> But the Kent Wills and the stooges will
> call it stalking anyway.
>
>
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1
|
