Who started accusing whom of being a stalker?
For months now the only accusations of "stalker"
have been an idiotic campaign by Kent Wills
and stooges (including Betty) to call me a stalker.
It's been said in reaction to various things that
Kent and his stooges DO NOT LIKE.
That is NOT what makes something stalking.
Kent claims to be Polish.
Kent makes a PUBLIC statement about his "romani" ethnicity.
Kent falsely asserts that "gypsy" is a slur by itself.
Kent claims to be Welsh Romani.
When I asked about this incompatible ping-pong,
TNKev asserts I am a stalker.
You KNOW that questioning a PUBLIC statement
is NOT stalking.
And to address the message thread title,
I'd like to again point out that Kent has
denied his Felony conviction despite
ample verifiable evidence that it is him.
Kent has no legal right against me posting
links to his public criminal and court records.
Posting those public records is NOT stalking.
Kent and stooges keep asserting it anyway.
Questioning a public statement is NOT stalking.
Posting criminal records is NOT stalking,
especially where somebody made PUBLIC denials
of a Felony conviction.
Asking Kent if his "corporation" as he has publicly
termed it, is incorporated, LLC or "Family Trust"
is not stalking. Kent BLABBED it up publicly.
Which form of incorporation is it Kent?
If you make me investigate the "corporation"
status, that ALSO will not be stalking.
But the Kent Wills and the stooges will
call it stalking anyway.
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1
