Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:13:36 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>G > Well, he did mention driving without registration
>G > and the Iowa courts show some hits for that.
>
>How come you didn't acknowledge those
>public comments you made Kent?

     I did.
     Is there any SPECIFIC reason you're lying about this?

>
>TNKev > showing how you love to stalk Kent greegor? ****bag.
>
>G > Checking Kent's PUBLIC statements against court records
>G > is not stalking.  Declaring it so is a deception or "con game".
>
>KW > What you chose to call Kevin's truthful
>KW > comment is YOUR issue to address.
>
>Kent Wills, ex-con, you are a con man.

     Your pathological lying does not make me a con man.
     Next pathological lie, please.

>
>G > Kev, You keep asserting that presenting
>G > public records is stalking.   Why is that?
>
>TNKev > searching out said public records and
>TNKev > posting them over and over again is
>TNKev > stalking and harassment.
>
>KRP > And posting them also on a website like your PAL Moore?????
>
>KRP >Please explain to me how THAT is "different" Kevin.
>
>KW > I'm not Kevin,
>
>G > Can you prove that?
>
>KW > Yes.
>
>If somebody investigates your public
>claim you'll call it ""stalking"" right?

     No.
     You asked a question.  I answered it.
     What is the SPECIFIC reason your trying to distract attention
from the truth?

>
>KW > but I think I can answer.
>KW > David is trying to protect people from
>KW > your con game.  He doesn't want to
>KW > see people lose a great deal of money
>KW > paying you for worthless consultations.
>
>G > How would Dave know?
>G > He was never a client of Ken Pangborn!
>
>KW > I presume he used the comments of
>KW > those who were.  Some of those comments
>KW > can be found on http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>
>G > And he sure as HELL doesn't have a "great deal of money".
>
>KW > I didn't say Kenny-Bob has a great deal of money.
>KW > His bankruptcy proves he doesn't.
>
>I was referring to David Daniel Moore, who lives in his
>adoptive mommy's basement at age 37.

     Small problem.  Kenny-Bob has claimed David's middle name is
Dennis.  He claimed to have proof.
     Was he lying then, or is he lying now, or are both instances
lies?

>
>Did you forget the CONTEXT of the
>"great deal of money" comment was from YOU?

     In reference to Kenny-Bob's potential clients.  
     Note that I wrote, " He doesn't want to see people lose a great
deal of money paying you for worthless consultations."
     To one with the ability to read beyond a fourth grade level, it's
clear that I wasn't making any reference to David.
     Is this further proof that your mind operates at a fourth grade
level, or another of your MANY lies?  I'll accept either answer.

>
>G > Dave's pissed because he got caught red handed
>G > doing his internet harassment at Sara Lee, Inc.
>
>KW > Except that David didn't work for Sara Lee.
>KW > You're basing your claim on one of
>KW > Kenny-Bob's lies.  Note that when anyone
>KW > asks for evidence of David ever having even
>KW > worked for Sara Lee, let alone being fired,
>KW > Kenny-Bob runs from the request.
>KW > He's done that at least five times with me.
>
>G > They fired his ass immediately and escorted him out.
>G > He has had several other employment problems,
>G > even working under false identities.
>
>KW > Can you provide evidence of these claim?
>KW >  Something credible.
>KW > Kenny-Bob has been proved to lie about
>KW > David far too many times to accept anything he claims.
>
>For you to pose as the arbiter of truth is absurd Kent.

     I take it you can't supply anything.  I didn't think you would be
able, since it's far more plausible than not that Kenny-Bob was lying.

>
>KW > Those who have commented on you have
>KW > said you're assistance was worthless.
>
>G > When one had positive comments the webmaster
>G > was outed and harassed immediately by your associates.
>
>KW > Except that no one contacted the web master.
>KW > That whole thing was based on fake E-mails from Lost.
>
>Caught with your pants down and parts hanging out you LIE.

     How, exactly, does the TRUTH that Lost lied (her own evidence
proved it) effect me?

>
>KW > By now you must be able to accept that she faked them.
>
>Nope.

     Then you are far more stupid than I dared think.
     Answer these question:

     Did Kevin's address appear in the E-mail she claimed had his
address?
     Did anyone's address, other than her own, appear in the E-mails
she claims were sent to others?

     Do TRY to be honest when you reply.  And don't bother with the
avoidance game.  

>
>KW > It's been proved that the people she claimed got
>KW > them didn't.  Her own evidence prove it.
>
>You are Kent Bradley Wills, Garage Burglary Felon, and liar.

     Lost's fake E-mails prove no such thing.
     Next lie, please.

>
>Kent and the BOAT registration
>1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.

     Yes.

>2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.

     No I didn't.

>3. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
>Caquelin's.

     Liar.

>4. Kent lied about boat registration some more.

     Liar.

>5. Kent's posted link to a youtube video of his boat.

     Yes.

>6. The boat registration was plainly visible.   IA 6312 WW

     It was, and is very visible in the video.


>7. video posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep 2007 purchase)

     When did I claim it was purchased in September?

>8. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
>Caquelin's.

     Liar.

>9. Kent claimed otherwise supposedly calling boat registration after
>4:30.

     That's not the name of the office, dullard.
     Is there anything about which you will not lie?

>10. Kent lied about boat registration (government) phone hours on
>recording.

     No I didn't.

>11. Kent removed the youtube video, and his entire youtube account.

     Nearly a month ago.

>
>The Kent Wills saga continues

     Truth has a way of going on and on.  I'm sure you HATE that.

     Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends?  You've refused to answer each time I've asked,
preferring to play the avoidance game instead.  Please answer now.



"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
   -- Gregory Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825febd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


>
>http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1