Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Bob Larson > Re: Kent's ""Fa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 227 Topic 1871 of 2225
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

by Greegor <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 14, 2008 at 08:13 PM

G > Well, he did mention driving without registration
G > and the Iowa courts show some hits for that.

How come you didn't acknowledge those
public comments you made Kent?

TNKev > showing how you love to stalk Kent greegor? ****bag.

G > Checking Kent's PUBLIC statements against court records
G > is not stalking. =A0Declaring it so is a deception or "con game".

KW > What you chose to call Kevin's truthful
KW > comment is YOUR issue to address.

Kent Wills, ex-con, you are a con man.

G > Kev, You keep asserting that presenting
G > public records is stalking. =A0 Why is that?

TNKev > searching out said public records and
TNKev > posting them over and over again is
TNKev > stalking and harassment.

KRP > And posting them also on a website like your PAL Moore?????

KRP >Please explain to me how THAT is "different" Kevin.

KW > I'm not Kevin,

G > Can you prove that?

KW > Yes.

If somebody investigates your public
claim you'll call it ""stalking"" right?

KW > but I think I can answer.
KW >=A0David is trying to protect people from
KW > your con game. =A0He doesn't want to
KW > see people lose a great deal of money
KW > paying you for worthless consultations.

G > How would Dave know?
G > He was never a client of Ken Pangborn!

KW > I presume he used the comments of
KW > those who were. =A0Some of those comments
KW > can be found on <snip!>

G > And he sure as HELL doesn't have a "great deal of money".

KW > I didn't say Kenny-Bob has a great deal of money.
KW >=A0His bankruptcy proves he doesn't.

I was referring to David Daniel Moore, who lives in his
adoptive mommy's basement at age 37.

Did you forget the CONTEXT of the
"great deal of money" comment was from YOU?

G > Dave's pissed because he got caught red handed
G > doing his internet harassment at Sara Lee, Inc.

KW > Except that David didn't work for Sara Lee.
KW > You're basing your claim on one of
KW > Kenny-Bob's lies.  Note that when anyone
KW > asks for evidence of David ever having even
KW > worked for Sara Lee, let alone being fired,
KW > Kenny-Bob runs from the request.
KW > He's done that at least five times with me.

G > They fired his ass immediately and escorted him out.
G > He has had several other employment problems,
G > even working under false identities.

KW > Can you provide evidence of these claim?
KW > =A0Something credible.
KW > Kenny-Bob has been proved to lie about
KW > David far too many times to accept anything he claims.

For you to pose as the arbiter of truth is absurd Kent.

KW > Those who have commented on you have
KW > said you're assistance was worthless.

G > When one had positive comments the webmaster
G > was outed and harassed immediately by your associates.

KW > Except that no one contacted the web master.
KW >=A0That whole thing was based on fake E-mails from Lost.

Caught with your pants down and parts hanging out you LIE.

KW > By now you must be able to accept that she faked them.

Nope.

KW >=A0It's been proved that the people she claimed got
KW > them didn't. =A0Her own evidence prove it.

You are Kent Bradley Wills, Garage Burglary Felon, and liar.

Kent and the BOAT registration
1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
3. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
Caquelin's.
4. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
5. Kent's posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
6. The boat registration was plainly visible.   IA 6312 WW
7. video posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep 2007 purchase)
8. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
Caquelin's.
9. Kent claimed otherwise supposedly calling boat registration after
4:30.
10. Kent lied about boat registration (government) phone hours on
recording.
11. Kent removed the youtube video, and his entire youtube account.

The Kent Wills saga continues

http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-02=
02.asp?search=3D+Kent+Wills+#_1
 




 227 Posts in Topic:
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 01:24:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
The 2-Belo <the2belo@[  2008-04-09 17:54:45 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 02:37:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 04:03:21 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 05:59:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 10:31:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 11:27:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 15:20:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:01:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:05:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:10:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-10 22:03:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:01:19 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 20:13:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 06:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:00:28 
Re:greegor's stalking of Kent continues
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:18:22 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 11:55:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 16:33:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:06:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:02:51 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 06:51:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-04-09 19:25:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:11:52 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:31:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 21:53:12 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:00:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:06:48 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-10 16:51:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 08:24:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-11 18:55:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 15:08:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:54:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:25 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-23 22:15:53 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-10 20:09:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 02:51:59 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-11 03:46:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 17:30:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:55:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:12 
ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-12 21:11:36 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:49:18 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:30:46 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 21:13:56 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 14:24:16 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 16:38:51 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 16:13:50 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 09:54:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:17:30 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 21:42:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-12 08:35:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 00:51:34 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 06:12:20 
Re: ot
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-12 19:44:40 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 09:13:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:36:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:53:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 12:02:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:49:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:59:47 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 14:16:00 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 22:06:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 10:32:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:36:31 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 11:51:53 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:51:27 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:42:06 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-14 14:02:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-14 18:45:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:13:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:46:20 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 17:58:29 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:11:37 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 05:17:00 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-13 08:11:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:27:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:43:13 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 11:55:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:32:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:37:46 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-13 16:56:04 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-14 07:06:39 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 17:25:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 19:57:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:58:44 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:27:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-15 05:41:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 14:11:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:00:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-16 17:43:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-16 21:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:46:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 07:24:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:57:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:21:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:20:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 00:23:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:16:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:04:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:38:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:49:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:20:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:15:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:13:41 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:48:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 23:18:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:13:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 00:51:30 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:01:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:04:25 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:07:38 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:37:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 22:41:20 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:57:36 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 03:01:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:49:40 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 18:45:45 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 23:39:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 01:20:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:43:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 17:32:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-04-22 12:00:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:42:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:48:12 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:32:42 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:37:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:16:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:26:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 12:17:59 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:33:37 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-25 13:41:26 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:03:29 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 00:04:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:40:14 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 15:10:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:33:28 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 06:45:22 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:39:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:50:39 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:39:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-21 05:04:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 10:28:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:57:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:57:21 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:37:49 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 02:14:41 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:43:27 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-24 18:35:13 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 21:30:10 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-25 08:45:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:38:12 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 03:29:49 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:40:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:48:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 02:17:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:50:15 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 16:35:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:11:07 
OT
gposter <gposter@[EMAI  2008-04-21 03:31:47 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 05:46:18 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 14:45:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 05:19:57 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 06:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 03:01:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:34:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:36:28 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-20 06:22:05 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-17 06:46:31 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-18 07:01:17 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 14:15:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:02:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:01:47 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-15 04:00:45 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:48:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:56:41 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 21:21:54 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 10:17:26 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 12:49:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:47:43 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 17:38:27 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:49:53 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:57:51 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 15:07:05 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 18:56:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:07:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:38:31 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:00:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 23:22:52 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:34:19 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-16 14:55:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:16:21 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 01:09:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:31:59 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-20 22:38:02 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 06:08:56 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-21 00:56:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:33:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-22 00:14:18 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-22 12:46:52 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:12:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:12:56 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:46:37 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:10:46 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:24:04 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:29:58 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-23 16:07:22 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 16:41:29 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 10:31:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-22 19:08:02 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 18:32:22 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-24 16:05:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:57:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-24 19:30:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:58:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-25 13:41:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 8:21:31 CST 2008.