On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:02:23 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>BW > I seem to recall you accusing me of stalking
>BW > for the very same reason, Greg.
>
>G > Where's the LINK, Betty?
>
>BW > Up your ass. Do you deny accusing
>BW > me of stalking and harassing for posting
>BW > to usenet in regard to one person?
>
>G > Betty, What "very same reason" are you talking about?
>
>KW > Avoidance of the question asked noted.
>
>Manipulative behavior noted.
Further avoidance noted.
>
>KW > That aside, what does alt.friends have
>KW > to do with your falsely accusing Betty of stalking?
>
>I haven't seen a link that proves that statement.
Do you deny that you accused her of such?
Again, what does alt.friends have to do with your falsely
accusing Betty of stalking?
>You put a false statement in the form of a question.
Is your mind so far gone that you think the members of
alt.friends are somehow involved with your false accusations?
Seek help, if this is the case.
>VERY manipulative.
Additional avoidance noted.
>
>KW > And why are you stalking and harassing
>KW > past and current members of alt.friends?
>
>Also manipulative, falsehood asserted as a question.
You supplied the PROOF of your stalking. And you are still
harassing the group. You keep adding the group after the members have
asked you to stop.
Do you really think your behavior is normal? Do you think
mentally sound people do such things?
>
>KW > You've so far refused to answer this question,
>
>I did answer the question, but it wasn't what you
>wanted to hear, so you pretend it wasn't answered.
>It's dishonest and VERY manipulative, Kent.
You've played the avoidance game.
It's getting old, Greg. Just answer the question.
>
>KW > preferring to play the avoidance game instead.
>
>Asking a qualifier question is no such thing.
>Refusal to answer a qualifier question indicates
>a lack of "good faith discussion" on your part.
YOU offered the proof that you were (and probably are) stalking
and harassing past and current members of alt.friends.
>
>KW > Please answer the question now.
>
>Kent, You repeatedly wrap falsehoods in questions.
When I wrote, "Please answer the question now." I was making a
request, not asking a question.
>Then you want to insist on a yes or no answer?
I've asked you WHY you are stalking and harassing past and
current members of alt.friends. It's not a yes or not question. As
such, it can't be properly answered with a yes or no.
>This is VERY manipulative behavior and shows
>a lack of "good faith" on your part.
What your mind chooses to call honesty on my part is YOUR issue
to address.
>
>KW > If you wish, you may simply admit that you are
>KW > a mentally ill person who honestly can't stop
>KW > himself. That your mind is so messed up
>KW > that even if you wanted to stop, you could not.
>KW > The members of alt.friends would certainly
>KW > show pity for your illness.
>
>Kent, This is extremely MANIPULATIVE behavior
>on your part, and less subtle than usual.
>Clumsy and heavy handed.
Since I'm not even trying to manipulate anyone, it can't be any
more or less subtle than anything else. Also, it's can't be clumsy or
heavy handed.
Next lie via innuendo, please.
Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends? No more game, no more word play. Simply answer the
question I've asked.
[Snip of Greg's latest PROOF that he's mentally unstable]
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
|
