BW > I seem to recall you accusing me of stalking
BW > for the very same reason, Greg.
G > Where's the LINK, Betty?
BW > Up your ass. =A0Do you deny accusing
BW > me of stalking and harassing for posting
BW > to usenet in regard to one person?
G > Betty, What "very same reason" are you talking about?
BW > Are you going to deny that you accused me
BW > of stalking and harassment because I reposted
BW > public information readily available in usenet
BW > posts in regard to Ilena Rosenthal?
BW > A yes or no answer will be sufficient.
Betty, attempting to force a yes or no answer
while refusing to answer a qualifying question is not OK.
If I was in court and somebody tried that I would
explain that I can't answer the question
until I know exactly what was asked.
How could I answer your question without knowing
what "very same reason" you are talking about?
Instead of characterizing what I supposedly
said and trying to force a yes or no answer,
why don't you just post a link to what
you are talking about?
I did ask you for a link to that and your
"up your ass" answer didn't exactly instill
confidence in your "good faith" dealings here.
Do you think it might also have something
to do with Kent's other stooges repeatedly
calling me a stalker with no proof.
