"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:94bf2839-fdf0-42a0-8deb-07e6bef77aa4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tjab > And yet notwithstanding the fact that it
> tjab > doesn't make sense to you, Kent Bradley
> tjab > Wills was convicted by a jury of his peers.
> tjab > Doesn't it just make you weep?
>
> 1. Property was all in kid's posession (questionable)
> 2. Ring missing from inside car (questionable)
> 3. Kent's explanation of why he was in the area (mystery)
> Why weren't these arguments used in the appeal to the Iowa Supreme
> Court?
>
> Why appeal using the lame argument that he had inadequate
> representation because the attorney would not
> argue that an attached garage is not part of a residence?
>
> This would not have been half as much fun if Kent
> had just acknowledged this Felony record.
> Kent's raging denial and the enlisted stooges make it much more fun!
Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends?
--
"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
|
