"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:a56ed19c-517d-4a63-aec0-18c9df1c04de@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>tjab > And yet notwithstanding the fact that it
>tjab > doesn't make sense to you, Kent Bradley
>tjab > Wills was convicted by a jury of his peers.
>tjab > Doesn't it just make you weep?
>
>1. Property was all in kid's posession (questionable)
>2. Ring missing from inside car (questionable)
>3. Kent's explanation of why he was in the area (mystery)
>Why weren't these arguments used in the appeal to the Iowa Supreme
>Court?
>
>Why appeal using the lame argument that he had inadequate
>representation because the attorney would not
>argue that an attached garage is not part of a residence?
>
>This would not have been half as much fun if Kent
>had just acknowledged this Felony record.
>Kent's raging denial and the enlisted stooges make it much more fun!
Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends? You've never answered this question, preferring to play the
avoidance game instead. Please answer the question now. Thanks.
--
"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
|
