Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

In article <ftj8gj$kfm$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, TNKev  <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Greegor wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 10:31 am, TNKev <TNKev...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Greegor wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
>>>> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
>>> years? I think it take all of 3 seconds at the most to type "Kent
Wills"
>>>
>>> idiot.
>> 
>> It only took a little longer for the WEBMASTER to
>> type in a list of birthdays including his own.
>> So what?
>> 
>> G > Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
>> 
>> TNK > case? what case?
>> 
>> Is this gonna be like the "singular they" confusion again Kev?
>
>you are the only one that's confused.
>
>why are you stalking the people of alt.friends?
>
>
>> 
>> G > Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
>> G > himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?
>> 
>> TNK > he has had the name for like 10
>> TNK > years or better,if he wasn't happy
>> TNK > with it I think he would change it.
>> 
>> Can he change this too?
>
>I don't why or if he would want to.
>
>> 
>>
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202
>> 
>> TNK > Whose problem would that be?
>> 
>> TNK > it looks to me (and I am sure other
>> TNK > readers would agree) that is you
>> TNK > that has a problem greegor.
>> 
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca
>> 
>> Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
>> Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
>> Moe > documents at the courthouse. You
>> Moe > said you actually saw the court
>> Moe > documents yourself.  Shall I get the
>> Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
>> Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
>> Moe > actually posted that?
>> 
>> tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.
>> 
>> Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
>> Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
>> to know why you think that is reasonable.
>> 
>> Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
>> Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
>> identity for himself, WHY do you think that
>> the burden of proof rests with people who
>> say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?
>> 
>> Either way, it Kent's problem.
>
>It's you that has a problem with Kent's nym.
>
>> 
>> If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
>> certainly not my fault.
>
>you say that as though he has a driver's license under his usenet nym.

If he has been able to get a license, he does have one under that name.

Reference the TSA tage and the airline ticket that he posted scans of
on the web.