Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

On Apr 11, 4:51=A0am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/...
>
> Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
> Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
> Moe > do***ents at the courthouse. You
> Moe > said you actually saw the court
> Moe > do***ents yourself. =A0Shall I get the
> Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
> Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
> Moe > actually posted that?
>
> tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.
>
> Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
> Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
> to know why you think that is reasonable.
>
> Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
> Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
> identity for himself, WHY do you think that
> the burden of proof rests with people who
> say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?
>
> Either way, it Kent's problem.
>
> If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
> certainly not my fault.
>
> In the real world, it's easy to see why the
> Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.
>
> Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
> a Garage Burglary Felon at all?
>
> Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
> Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
> then why is he now trying to reverse it?
>
> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
>
> Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
>
> Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
> himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?
>
> Whose problem would that be?
>
> If that were the case, then Who is to blame?

You tell me, STALKER.

Moe
 Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/