Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca

Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
Moe > documents at the courthouse. You
Moe > said you actually saw the court
Moe > documents yourself.  Shall I get the
Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
Moe > actually posted that?

tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.

Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
to know why you think that is reasonable.

Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
identity for himself, WHY do you think that
the burden of proof rests with people who
say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?

Either way, it Kent's problem.

If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
certainly not my fault.

In the real world, it's easy to see why the
Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.

Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
a Garage Burglary Felon at all?

Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
then why is he now trying to reverse it?

Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?

Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?

Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?

Whose problem would that be?

If that were the case, then Who is to blame?