On Apr 10, 6:47=A0pm, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: in one of his
tenper tantrums
> ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW - on IMMIGRATION LAW LECTURE"Kunt Wills"
<co=
mpu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:ftm6vq$bvk$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> EXPERT LEGAL OPINION TO FOLLOW
> > =A0 You are not an expert on the law.
> > =A0 =A0Is there ANY topic about which you will not lie?
>
> =A0 =A0 I was speaking of YOUR ecxpertise
"Ecxpertise"?
> Kunt. =A0You as the leading legal
> authority not only in American immigration law, but the elading
"elading"?
> authority in
> the world on Cuba's immigration law. =A0The sheer epxnsie
"epxnsie"?
> of your CERTIFIED
> AAAA++++ legal expertise is awesome Attorney Wills.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>> "We were first married in Cuba to satisfy Cuban law so they'd
let
> >>>>>>> her go, then again in the US to satisfy U.S. Law so she could
stay=
..
> >>>>>>> "
> >>>>>> =A0 =A0Uh Kunt- OUT of context.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 Liar.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 I included the link to your original post so that those
who =
wish
> >>>>> can check the context, dullard.
>
> >>>>>>Under the Cuban Adjustment act (LAW) she could stay anyway.
>
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 DUH!
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 Why did you claim that the reason you got married in the
U.S=
.. was
> >>>>> "...to satisfy U.S. Law so she could stay. "?
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0CAN YOU READ twerp? I sent you the LINKS. That old Polish
illi=
teracy
> >>>> kicking in again Kunt?
Speaking of illiteracy Kenny-BOB.....
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 I posted a link to the article I quote. =A0 =A0Where are the
l=
inks in
> >>> it?
>
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/..=
..
> >> =A0 =A0Clever Kunt pick out one of 30 posts that doesn't have the
link =
BRAVO!
> >> Great Polish logic.
> > =A0 =A0 You're making less and less sense.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt - on this subject I made perhaps 30 different posts. I had
th=
e link
> in many but not EVERY one of them. To bne an asshole you merely linked
to
> one where I didn't. That's a pretty standard trick of yours in a
discussio=
n.
>
> > =A0 =A0 The link is to the post where you LIED and said the reason you
g=
ot
> > married in the U.S. was so that your wife could stay.
>
> =A0 =A0 Which is true on it's face. In your POLACK reasoning, that has
to =
mean
> that if we didn't do it (U.S. Marriage) that she'd be deported. That
happe=
ns
> then you have a IQ in the minus range Kunt. You being just a little wise
a=
ss
> Polack troll. Deportation wasn't the issue, but takinbg
"takinbg"?
on Homeleand
> Security WAS the issue, and I tried to llustrate the issue to you (but
you=
> are too stupid to get it) by referring to the old Abbott & Costello
sketch=
> "Pay the Man the Two Dollars." Which a MORON like you can't grasp. It is
o=
ne
> of the most famous gags ever done on their TV show.
Actually the baseball sketch is the most famous one.
>
> >>>>>>BUT to comply with U.S. Law on a K-1 Visa it required a U.S.
Marriag=
e
> >>>>>>within 6 months of her landing.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 If you were already married, she shouldn't have come under
a=
> >>>>> finace visa.
> >>>> =A0 =A0Is that your =A0Certified AAAA+++++ EXPERT "LEGAL OPINION"
Att=
orney
> >>>> Wills?
> >>> =A0 =A0 No.
> >> =A0 =A0Was it just one of your ORDINARY expert opinions then?
> > =A0 =A0 No.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0A special EXPERT opinion then?
>
> >>>> What kind of Visa should she have come under?
> >>> =A0 =A0 Whatever a wife comes under.
> >> =A0 =A0Oh really? With your VAST legel
"legel"?
expertise I thought you would have
> >> that right on the tip of your fingers - er BIG MOUTH! And ATTORNEY
WILL=
S
> > =A0 =A0 I'm not an attorney.
>
> =A0 =A0 You just dispense LEGAL opinions.
>
> > =A0 =A0 What is the root cause of your psychological NEED to LIE in
ever=
y
> > post?
>
> =A0 =A0 No just commenting on your bullshit claims of expertise Kunt.
>
> >>in your VAST immigration litigation experiences, from your THOUSANDS
of
> >>cases, what are the differences between the K-1 Fiance visa and the
> >>foreign wife Visa?
> > =A0 =A0Why do you lie in EVERY post?
>
> =A0 =A0 So in your "EXPERT OPINION" as an immigration ATTORNEY then -
ther=
e is
> NO difference between a K-1 Visa and a K-3 Visa/ That isx yopur
"isx yopur"?
> L:EGAL
> OPINION Attorney Wills?
>
> >> Just in case it slips your mind for the moment that is a K-3 visa.
Now
> >> can I expect a FULL analysis comparing the two. Such as oh LEGAL
GENIUS=
,
> >> is there a difference in time to process each of the visas?
> > =A0 =A0 Yes.
>
> =A0 =A0 Give us your EXPERT LEGAL OPINION on those differences Attorney
Wi=
lls.
>
> >>Is there a difference in the level of evidence that must be submitted?
> > =A0 =A0 Yes.
>
> =A0 =A0 Okay - be specific Attorney WIlls. Your EXPERT legal diagnosis.
>
> >> =A0Will do you practice being this STUPID or is it REALLY genetic?
> > =A0 =A0 I consistently prove I'm smarter than you. =A0Sadly, this
isn't =
saying a
> > great deal.
And his misspellings /typos when he's mad are more grevious than my
typos, and more painful to see.
>
> =A0 =A0 Good. SO give us your EXPERT immigration lawyer explanation of
the=
> differences between the K-1 and tghe
"tghe"?
> K-3 visa as it would influeunce the
> processing of entry to the United States and issuance of a green card.
Jus=
t
> your EXPERT LEGAL OPINION Kunt.
>
> >>>>And what are the major differences between them and a K-1 Visa??? I
> >>>>measn as THE FCOREMOST LEGAL EXPERT on immigration law Kunt. Give us
> >>>>your official LEGAL OPINION!
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 You can LIE all your warped mind requires of you. =A0The
truth=
will
> >>> remain that I'm not an expert on any law.
> >> =A0 =A0NO SHIT!!!!
> > =A0 =A0 Since you seem to now accept that I'm not an expert, please
expl=
ain
> > why you LIED and claimed I am.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt just about EVERYONE KNOWS how TOTALLY IGNORANT you are on
mos=
t of
> the subjects you ARGUE. But that NEVER slows your dogmatic bullshit from
> overflowing.
IRONY ALERT!!!
> Nopw TELL US how the K-1 and K-3 visas differ IN YOUR EXPERT
> LEGAL OPINION.
>
> >> BUT Kunt- that NEVER seems to slkow down your dogmatic and ABUSIVE
> >> OPINIONS on ANY legal subject going.
> > =A0 =A0 That I am able to consistently prove you to be the
pathological =
liar
> > you are doesn't make me abusive.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt you don't prove it. You merely become abusive when I or
anyon=
e else
> doesn't bow to your "EXPERTISE" on any given subject.
IRONY ALERT!!
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 What is the SPECIFIC reason you are compelled to lie about
thi=
s?
> >> =A0 =A0It's not lying Kunt is it complete and absolute CONTEMPT for
you=
and
> >> your bullshit MISTER TROLL!
> > =A0 =A0 That you see truth as bullshit is YOUR issue to address.
>
> =A0 =A0 The truth isn't bullshit, just about 99% of whay YOU say IS!
IRONY ALERT!!
>
> >>>>>>She could stay - but it hust would have complicated everything and
> >>>>>>delayed processing had we not done it. We had to comply with Cuban
l=
aw
> >>>>>>and U.S. law. =A0But AGAIN I sent you a copy of our Cuban mariage
> >>>>>>certificate but you have chosen to LIE about it.
>
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 *IF* you sent it, you did so AFTER I announced your
address =
was
> >>>>> being filtered.
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0NO Kunt I sent it 2 days BEFORE.
> >>> =A0 =A0 Liar.
> >> =A0 =A0Yes YOU are!
> > =A0 =A0 So you never sent it. =A0Got it. =A0I expect it was never
sent, =
but had
> > nothing I could point to as evidence.
>
> =A0 =A0 It WAS sent, I posted the message with headers it was attached
to.=
YOU
> are the LIAR here.
>
> >>>>YOU are doing that LYING thing again Kunt.
> >>> =A0 =A0 You're flat out lying. =A0You never sent it, unless it was
aft=
er I
> >>> filtered your address. =A0Odds are you didn't send it at all, though
I=
> >>> don't think I'll ever be able to prove it.
>
> >> =A0 =A0Look dipshit after you tried your BULLSHIT to try to claim you
n=
ever
> >> got it, you slipped and WHINED that I only sent the top 10% of it and
n=
ot
> >> the whole document.
> > =A0 =A0Liar. =A0I've made no such comment.
>
> =A0 =A0 Yes you did Kunt. You let that slip almost a month later.
>
> >>Given your alliance with Moore I did NOT want to hand out the
addresses =
of
> >>my in-laws in Cuba for his (and possibly YOUR) harassment. How
convinien=
t
> >>to FILTER just as the evidence was presented.
> > =A0 =A0 *IF* you sent it (I expect everyone has accepted you never
sent =
it,
> > though each person would need to say for him/her self), it was AFTER I
> > announced I wouldn't see any E-mails from that address.
>
> =A0 =A0 Only your hard core supporters believe that. Of course I could
alw=
ays
> send it again - BUT you'd LIE about it.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>you should be able to enter K-1 VISA in a search and read what it
> >>>>>>says. Then read the Cuban Adjustment act.
>
> >>>>>> Oh STUPID here are some LINKS for you AGAIN.
>
> >>>>>>http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/types/types_2994.html
>
> >>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Adjustment_Act
>
> >>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_feet,_dry_feet_policy
>
> >>>>>>http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/news026.htm
>
> >>>>>>http://www.ailc.com/services/residency/CAA-1.htm
>
> >>>>>>http://www.fiu.edu/~ipor/cuba2000/q22.htm
>
> >>>>>>http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/Buschini063006.pdf
>
> >>>>>> So much for your POLISH BULLSHIT.
>
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 Are you claiming you did NOT claim you married her in the
U.=
S. so
> >>>>> that she could stay?
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0Did you actually READ =A0- ANY of those links dipshit?
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 Do any of them alter what you posted?
>
> >> =A0 =A0You are a dumb Polack!
> > =A0 =A0 Everyone knows you hate everyone in/from Poland. =A0Old news.
>
> =A0 =A0 Nope JUST YOU Kunt!
>
> >>No they prove what I said Kunt and prove that YOU are 100% full of
shit.=
> > =A0 =A0 You claimed you married Barbara in the U.S. so that she could
st=
ay.
> > That was YOUR claim.
>
> =A0 =A0 Did you READ any of the links above Kunt? I thought not!!
>
> >>>>NO! We got married in Cuba to satisfy Cuban law so she and the
childre=
n
> >>>>could get an EXIT visa from the CUBAN GOVERNMENT.
> >>> =A0 =A0 Why are you asking me?
> >> =A0 =A0Because you are the FOREMOST expert on U.S. AND Cuban
immigratio=
n LAW
> >> in history! Or so you seem to believe.
> > =A0 =A0 Is there any SPECIFIC reason you are psychologically COMPELLED
t=
o lie
> > about this?
>
> =A0 =A0 Aren't you COMPLETELY expert on Cuban law, Kunt? Enough to argue
w=
ith me
> about it.
>
> >>>>Can you get that dipshit? CUBAN LAW - I know you are an "CERTIFIED
> >>>>EXPERT" on CUBAN LAW too!
> >>> =A0 =A0 Liar.
>
> >> =A0 =A0You seem to believe you are.
>
> > =A0 =A0Liar.
> >>Your strident OPINIONS must be based on EXPERT KNOWLEDGE. Right? VAST
> >>knowledge.
> > =A0 =A0 I'm stating, as fact, that you claimed you got married in the
U.=
S. so
> > that Barbara could stay.
> > =A0 =A0 I don't know what the real reason was, but it's clear you LIED
w=
hen
> > you =A0claimed it was so that she could stay.
>
> =A0 =A0 No Kunt you just apply the POLISH interpretation to that. The
one =
you
> NEED to. Yes, so she could stay, but it ...
>
> read more =BB- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
|
