On Apr 8, 8:45=A0pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab) wrote:
> In article
<be65a6bb-01d7-44d7-8d56-e395cda5e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> forevernitefan =A0<fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 8:32=3DA0pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab) wrote:
> >> In article
<635374d8-6c13-440b-a0e0-2fc49c4dc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >com>,
>
> >> forevernitefan =3DA0<fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On Apr 3, 6:58=3D3DA0pm, "Kent Wills" <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> "forevernitefan" <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>
>>news:b92ddfea-948b-43f2-88f1-6d97e3183de9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >.
> >> >> On Apr 3, 5:08 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> [...]
>
> >> >> >> Very well said.
>
> >> >> >> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
>
> >> >> >> The "clown" aspect reminds me of Kent Wills' famous quotes.
>
> >> >> >Well gag you certaily kow how the legal system works. After all,
> >> >> >you've had many experiences and even some time being locked up to
> >> >> >prove it.
>
> >> >> =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0He was convicted of beating his ex-wife
TWICE=
..
> >> >> =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0You'll note from his posts that he is
unable =
to admit =3D
> >his
> >> >> responsibility. =3D3DA0It was all her fault.
> >> >> =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0I'm certainly no expert on abusers, and
this =
question =3D
> >isn't mea=3D3D
> >> >nt to
> >> >> imply you are, but isn't it the norm for abusers to state the
victim=
ma=3D
> >de
> >> >> them do it?
> >> > Yes, usually the abusers say things like " she provoked me to hit
> >> >her" and " she was nagging me: or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
> >> >that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see
that=
> >> >pattern clearly and state this with confidence.
>
> >> >> > I've said what constitutes proof for me. If you and " legal
expert=
"
> >> >> >Tjab want to claim what you have is legal proof, feel free to
submi=
t
> >> >> >such in a court of law. I am not in " denial" I SAID I would
start =
to
> >> >> >believe you people IF you provided scanned copies of the legal
cour=
t
> >> >> >do***ents available at the courthouse in question.
>
> >> >> =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0Heck, tjab claimed in a thread about the
docu=
ments at =3D
> >the court=3D3D
> >> > house
> >> >> that he had seen them.
> >> >> =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0 =3D3DA0I still find it amusing how quickly you
prove=
d he lied=3D
> >.
>
> >> > He had it coming.
>
> >> "Yes, usually the abusers say things like 'she provoked me to hit
> >> her' and 'she was nagging me' or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
> >> that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see
that.=
"
>
> >> -Moe, two seconds earlier
>
> >> (BTW, you proved nothing and never will, bcause you are trying to
prove=
> >> something that never happened.))
>
> > This was about Gaggie's excuses for beating his two GFs. Tjab, DO try
> >to keep up. My response was about excuses abusers make. I've read
> >enough to know, Tjab.
>
> > Are your comprehension skills messing up?
>
> >> >What I find interesting is how he's been weasleing
> >> >out of that claim by saying what he " saw" was the stuff on the web
> >> >site and OC some summary in a book.
>
> >> Full opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa, in Iowa's official
re****ter.=
>
> I notice you don't even bother to deny you were lying when you called
> the full opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa, in Iowa's official
> re****ter, upholding Kent's felony conviction, "some summary in a book."
>
> >> Overcome your denial and turn that over in your head long enough for
> >> it to finally register. (Just kidding - of course it long since has.)
>
> > =A0 Silence me, Tjab by showing me scanned copies of the actual court
> >do***ents at the courthouse. You said you actually saw the court
> >do***ents yourself. =A0Shall I get the google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
> >Tjab, or are you going to deny you actually posted that?
>
> Yes, and yes, liar.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ah I pointed out YOUR lie when you said you saw the actual court
do***ents. Your credibility is hardly worth noting, hypocrite.
Tjab, funny ho you claimed " no one cares" about this and yet you
spend SO much time on it.
My point still stands, kiddo. In order to convince me of your cliams
about Kent, I want to see scans of the actual case court do***ents,
Try to AVOID that all you want, but youknow my requirement for proof
is reasonable.
Now do you HAVE THOSE or not, Tjab? Greg? Anyone?
<< sound of crickets chirping>>>
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
|
