KW > So she made you do it, huh?
KW > 100% consistent with the mind
KW > set of an abuser. And Greg,
KW > you really like to abuse females.
KW > Why are you stalking and harassing
KW > past and current regulars of alt.friends?
KW > You've yet to answer this question.
KW > Why are you DISHONESTLY (read: LYING)
KW > claiming that Kevin wrote that
KW > which you know I wrote?
Golly, Kent, I can't imagine how I could
confuse what you wrote with what one
of your stooges wrote FOR YOU ! LOL
KW > And why are you stalking and
KW > harassing past and current
KW > members of alt.friends?
I am not stalking them.
Why are you pretending that I am stalking alt.friends?
KW > "Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Mekka Lekka Heiney Ho!
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca
Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
Moe > documents at the courthouse. You
Moe > said you actually saw the court
Moe > documents yourself. Shall I get the
Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
Moe > actually posted that?
tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.
Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
to know why you think that is reasonable.
Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
identity for himself, WHY do you think that
the burden of proof rests with people who
say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?
Either way, it Kent's problem.
If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
certainly not my fault.
In the real world, it's easy to see why the
Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.
Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
a Garage Burglary Felon at all?
Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
then why is he now trying to reverse it?
Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
|
