Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

"dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:XBeLj.7899$V14.6680@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 for brevity]

>
> Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
> Kent Bradley Wills
>
> *****That is really NOT what he claims.
> You should try to understand what you read.
>

     Greg's view is consistent with that of most eight to nine year olds. 
They often read what they want into things, then get upset when their
error 
is shown.

[...]

>
> If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
> certainly not my fault.
>
> ***And it's certainly not YOUR fault that you harass him either, is it?

    He's stalking AND harassing.  Not just me.  Past and current members
of 
alt.friends as well.

>
>
> In the real world, it's easy to see why the
> Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.
>
> Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
> a Garage Burglary Felon at all?
>
> ****I thought we went over this before.
> Kent was using the name before the name was associated with a court
case.

      Since 1993, actually.  That's when the "B" Prodigy account was set
up 
for me.
     Given the amount of time Greg has spend searching out my old posts,
I'm 
certain he's aware of this.  Sadly, he's not able to be honest about it.

>
>
> Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
> Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
> then why is he now trying to reverse it?
>
> ***He is?  Where?
>

     Greg is lying, of course.  If I wanted to alter it in any way, it
would 
be realy easy to do.  I could post with my real first name, or make up a
new 
one.

>
> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
>
> ****Who has to 'work' at 'creating' a fake ID?
> It's called a NYM...we all have them...or, most of us do.
> It's pretty easy, really, you just thinking up something and you type it

> and VIOLA, there it is.
> No work to it.

     In my case, I didn't have to do any work.  It was chosen for me.  A 
joke that only two people understood.  And it wasn't all that funny
anyway.

[...]

>
> If that were the case, then Who is to blame?
>
> TNK > to blame for what simpleton?
>
> The hypothetical FAKE ID.
>
> ****No one really disputes who is responsible for the ID.
> It's your stalking that is in dispute.

     No it's not.  Greg stalks people.
     He may have been able to intimidate people in the past with his 
stalking, but he'll soon learn he can't intimidate me.

> You think you aren't a stalker.
> Your persistent look ups and posting prove different.
> You stalk.  That's the issue.
> BTW...when you want to piss and moan about how Kane, et al, took over
this 
> newsgroup and destroyed it you should really think hard about whether or

> not you are projecting.

     Greg wouldn't be the first to try and destroy alt.friends.  Doc
failed, 
and he put in one heck of an effort.
     He then sent Peter Hucker.  He tried, but he also failed.
     We get the odd troll now and again who will try to destroy the group.

Everyone has failed every time.



-- 

"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.