Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Bob Larson > Re: Kent's ""Fa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 227 Topic 1871 of 2225
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

by "Kent Wills" <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM

"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:5e1f72bd-a907-442f-97db-78a4db630c16@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 9, 10:31 am, TNKev <TNKev...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Greegor wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
>> > years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
>>
>> years? I think it take all of 3 seconds at the most to type "Kent
Wills"
>>
>> idiot.
>
>It only took a little longer for the WEBMASTER to
>type in a list of birthdays including his own.

     I have no idea how long it took Vijay to write out all the birthdays.

It took less than five seconds for me to C&P them and add my own when I
took 
over.

>So what?

      Yes, Greg.  So what does the birthdates of past and current members
of 
alt.friends have to do with anything?  Why, exactly, are you stalking past

and current members of alt.friends?

>
>G > Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
>
>TNK > case? what case?
>
>Is this gonna be like the "singular they" confusion again Kev?
>

     What singular they?
      Oh, do you mean when I mentioned that I ask a friend (singular) who
is 
a retired Rabbi (still singular) and you called him "them"?

>G > Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
>G > himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?
>
>TNK > he has had the name for like 10
>TNK > years or better,if he wasn't happy
>TNK > with it I think he would change it.
>
>Can he change this too?
>
>http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1

     Yes.

>
>TNK > Whose problem would that be?

     Why are you claiming Kevin wrote that which YOU wrote?
     How deeply rooted is your psychological NEED to lie?

>
>TNK > it looks to me (and I am sure other
>TNK > readers would agree) that is you
>TNK > that has a problem greegor.
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca
>

     I fail to see what relevance tjab's latest misadventure with truth
has 
to do with anything.

[snip of stuff Greg C&P from another of his posts]

>
>If that were the case, then Who is to blame?
>
>TNK > to blame for what simpleton?
>
>The hypothetical FAKE ID.

     Who is assigning blame?

>
>TNK > the stalking of Kent and members of
>TNK > alt.friends? that would be *YOU*
>TNK >
>TNK > stalker.


     Greg, why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of 
alt.friends?


-- 

"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
 




 227 Posts in Topic:
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 01:24:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
The 2-Belo <the2belo@[  2008-04-09 17:54:45 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 02:37:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 04:03:21 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 05:59:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 10:31:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 11:27:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 15:20:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:01:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:05:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:10:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-10 22:03:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:01:19 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 20:13:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 06:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:00:28 
Re:greegor's stalking of Kent continues
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:18:22 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 11:55:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 16:33:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:06:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:02:51 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 06:51:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-04-09 19:25:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:11:52 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:31:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 21:53:12 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:00:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:06:48 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-10 16:51:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 08:24:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-11 18:55:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 15:08:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:54:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:25 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-23 22:15:53 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-10 20:09:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 02:51:59 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-11 03:46:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 17:30:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:55:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:12 
ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-12 21:11:36 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:49:18 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:30:46 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 21:13:56 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 14:24:16 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 16:38:51 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 16:13:50 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 09:54:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:17:30 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 21:42:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-12 08:35:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 00:51:34 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 06:12:20 
Re: ot
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-12 19:44:40 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 09:13:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:36:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:53:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 12:02:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:49:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:59:47 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 14:16:00 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 22:06:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 10:32:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:36:31 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 11:51:53 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:51:27 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:42:06 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-14 14:02:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-14 18:45:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:13:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:46:20 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 17:58:29 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:11:37 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 05:17:00 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-13 08:11:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:27:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:43:13 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 11:55:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:32:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:37:46 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-13 16:56:04 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-14 07:06:39 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 17:25:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 19:57:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:58:44 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:27:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-15 05:41:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 14:11:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:00:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-16 17:43:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-16 21:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:46:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 07:24:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:57:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:21:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:20:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 00:23:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:16:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:04:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:38:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:49:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:20:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:15:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:13:41 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:48:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 23:18:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:13:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 00:51:30 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:01:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:04:25 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:07:38 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:37:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 22:41:20 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:57:36 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 03:01:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:49:40 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 18:45:45 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 23:39:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 01:20:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:43:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 17:32:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-04-22 12:00:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:42:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:48:12 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:32:42 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:37:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:16:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:26:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 12:17:59 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:33:37 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-25 13:41:26 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:03:29 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 00:04:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:40:14 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 15:10:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:33:28 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 06:45:22 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:39:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:50:39 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:39:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-21 05:04:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 10:28:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:57:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:57:21 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:37:49 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 02:14:41 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:43:27 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-24 18:35:13 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 21:30:10 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-25 08:45:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:38:12 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 03:29:49 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:40:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:48:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 02:17:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:50:15 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 16:35:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:11:07 
OT
gposter <gposter@[EMAI  2008-04-21 03:31:47 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 05:46:18 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 14:45:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 05:19:57 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 06:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 03:01:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:34:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:36:28 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-20 06:22:05 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-17 06:46:31 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-18 07:01:17 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 14:15:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:02:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:01:47 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-15 04:00:45 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:48:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:56:41 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 21:21:54 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 10:17:26 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 12:49:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:47:43 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 17:38:27 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:49:53 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:57:51 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 15:07:05 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 18:56:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:07:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:38:31 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:00:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 23:22:52 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:34:19 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-16 14:55:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:16:21 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 01:09:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:31:59 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-20 22:38:02 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 06:08:56 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-21 00:56:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:33:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-22 00:14:18 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-22 12:46:52 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:12:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:12:56 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:46:37 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:10:46 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:24:04 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:29:58 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-23 16:07:22 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 16:41:29 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 10:31:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-22 19:08:02 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 18:32:22 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-24 16:05:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:57:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-24 19:30:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:58:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-25 13:41:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 20:38:49 CST 2008.