Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Celebrities > Bob Larson > Re: Kent's ""Fa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 227 Topic 1871 of 1996
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

by "Kent Wills" <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 9, 2008 at 09:53 PM

"Greegor" <Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:8b5efdcc-5161-4890-9500-7b0651c6a875@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca
>
> Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
> Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
> Moe > do***ents at the courthouse. You
> Moe > said you actually saw the court
> Moe > do***ents yourself.  Shall I get the
> Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
> Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
> Moe > actually posted that?
>
> tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.

     Once again tjab is lying.
     He did claim to have seen the original do***ents in a thread about
the 
original do***ents located at the courthouse.

>
> Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
> Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
> to know why you think that is reasonable.

     Why do you think hanging out in the bathroom while a six-year-old
girl 
is showierng is reasonable?
     Why do you think forcing a six-year-old to go dumpster diving is 
reasonable?
     Why do you think locking a six-year-old girl out of the house with no

coat or shoes in the middle of an Iowa winter is reasonable?

>
> Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
> Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
> identity for himself, WHY do you think that
> the burden of proof rests with people who
> say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?
>
> Either way, it Kent's problem.

    Why?  My life hasn't changed.

>
> If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
> certainly not my fault.

     When has anyone claimed it is?
     Is there a specific reason you try to defend yourself against charges

that were never made?  Is it so that you can continue to dishonestly claim

to be a victim?

>
> In the real world, it's easy to see why the
> Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.
>
> Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
> a Garage Burglary Felon at all?

     I'll try, once again, to dumb it down to your level.
     To trap a stalker.  And it worked.

>
> Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
> Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
> then why is he now trying to reverse it?

    Over years?
    It was set up over a matter of seconds, dullard.  I wasn't even there 
when the Kent name was chosen.

>
> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?

     Only you think the time it takes to enter four letters (a few
seconds) 
would equate to years.

>
> Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?

     The one trying to prove something.
     In this instance, that would be you.

>
> Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
> himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?

     I'm having a rather happy life.
     Well, the sun burn I got while in Hawaii didn't make me real happy. 
But other than that, my life is pretty good.

>
> Whose problem would that be?

     Must be yours, since you're the one complaining about it.

>
> If that were the case, then Who is to blame?

     That your life sucks will most probably be your fault. You made the 
choices and committed the acts that lead to the life you have.

     Once again I ask, why are you stalking and harassing past and current

members of alt.friends?  You've only managed to play the avoidance game
when 
I've asked.  Please answer the question now.



-- 

"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek ****h, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
 




 227 Posts in Topic:
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 01:24:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
The 2-Belo <the2belo@[  2008-04-09 17:54:45 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 02:37:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 04:03:21 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 05:59:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 10:31:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 11:27:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-09 15:20:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:01:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:05:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:10:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-10 22:03:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:01:19 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 20:13:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 06:14:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 18:00:28 
Re:greegor's stalking of Kent continues
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:18:22 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-09 11:55:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-09 16:33:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"dragonsgirl" &  2008-04-09 21:06:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:02:51 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:53:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 06:51:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"_ Prof. Jonez _&quo  2008-04-09 19:25:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 22:11:52 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:54:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:31:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-09 21:53:12 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-09 22:00:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-10 07:53:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:06:48 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-10 16:51:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 08:24:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-11 18:55:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-11 15:08:09 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:54:15 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:25 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-23 22:15:53 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-10 20:09:48 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 02:51:59 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-11 03:46:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 17:30:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-11 20:55:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-11 22:44:12 
ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-12 21:11:36 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:49:18 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:30:46 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 21:13:56 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 14:24:16 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 16:38:51 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 16:13:50 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 09:54:47 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:17:30 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-11 21:42:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-12 08:35:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"John \"C\"  2008-04-13 00:51:34 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 06:12:20 
Re: ot
"Peter Hucker"   2008-04-12 19:44:40 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 09:13:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-12 12:36:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-12 13:53:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 12:02:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:49:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:59:47 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-12 14:16:00 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-12 22:06:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 10:32:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-13 18:36:31 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 11:51:53 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-20 17:51:27 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:42:06 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-14 14:02:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-14 18:45:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:13:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:46:20 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 17:58:29 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 17:11:37 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 05:17:00 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-13 08:11:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
"Kent Wills" &l  2008-04-13 11:27:33 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-14 06:43:13 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-13 11:55:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:32:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-13 15:37:46 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-13 16:56:04 
ot
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-14 07:06:39 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-14 17:25:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-14 19:57:23 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 13:58:44 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense - and the Moore website
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:27:13 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-15 05:41:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-15 14:11:02 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:00:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-16 17:43:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-16 21:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:46:50 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 07:24:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:57:18 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:21:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:20:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 00:23:43 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:16:38 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:04:11 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:38:34 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:49:07 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:20:25 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-17 18:15:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-18 08:13:41 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-18 17:48:24 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 23:18:03 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 07:13:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 00:51:30 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 13:01:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 11:04:25 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:07:38 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into his criminal case in Indiana
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:37:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-19 22:41:20 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-19 21:57:36 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 03:01:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:49:40 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 18:45:45 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-20 23:39:01 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 01:20:51 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:43:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 17:32:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-04-22 12:00:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:42:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:48:12 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:32:42 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:37:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:16:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:26:23 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 12:17:59 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:33:37 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-25 13:41:26 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:03:29 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 00:04:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:40:14 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 15:10:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:33:28 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 06:45:22 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-19 23:39:44 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-20 11:50:39 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-20 12:39:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-21 05:04:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-21 10:28:50 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:57:05 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:57:21 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 18:37:49 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 02:14:41 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-23 01:43:27 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 05:51:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-24 18:35:13 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-24 21:30:10 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-25 08:45:03 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 19:38:12 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-25 03:29:49 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:40:32 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-23 16:24:08 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:48:46 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-22 02:17:07 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-22 06:50:15 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 16:35:18 
Re: David Moore's RESEARCH into unrelated criminal case in India
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:11:07 
OT
gposter <gposter@[EMAI  2008-04-21 03:31:47 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 05:46:18 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 14:45:16 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 05:19:57 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 06:39:32 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
freedom <aboutKRPken@[  2008-04-17 03:01:42 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
" krp" <krp2  2008-04-17 10:34:14 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-16 19:36:28 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-20 06:22:05 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-17 06:46:31 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-18 07:01:17 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-19 14:15:36 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-15 10:02:58 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 18:01:47 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-15 04:00:45 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:48:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-15 15:56:41 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-15 21:21:54 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 10:17:26 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 12:49:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:47:43 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 17:38:27 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-23 10:49:53 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:57:51 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-24 15:07:05 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-24 18:56:59 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
snickers <mars@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 11:07:34 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:38:31 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-24 17:00:14 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-24 23:22:52 
Re: ATTORNEY KENT WILLS WILL EXPLAIN IMMIGRATION LAW TO US
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-25 21:34:19 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-16 14:55:35 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-20 17:16:21 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 01:09:39 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:31:59 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-20 22:38:02 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 06:08:56 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-04-21 00:56:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-21 17:33:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-22 00:14:18 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-22 12:46:52 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:12:13 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
TNKev <TNKevtoo@[EMAIL  2008-04-23 16:12:56 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-23 22:46:37 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-04-22 19:10:46 
Re: Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:24:04 
ot asCPS
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-22 05:29:58 
Kent's PRIVATE personal W W W
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-04-23 16:07:22 
ot alt.support.child-protective-services
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-04-23 16:41:29 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 10:31:55 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-22 19:08:02 
Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-22 18:32:22 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-24 16:05:46 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:57:17 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-05-24 19:30:26 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-05-24 22:58:01 
Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense
forevernitefan <fvrnit  2008-05-25 13:41:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 26 11:24:17 CDT 2008.