Re: Kent's ""Fake ID"" makes no sense

Greegor wrote:
> On Apr 9, 10:31 am, TNKev <TNKev...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Greegor wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
>>> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
>> years? I think it take all of 3 seconds at the most to type "Kent
Wills"
>>
>> idiot.
> 
> It only took a little longer for the WEBMASTER to
> type in a list of birthdays including his own.
> So what?
> 
> G > Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
> 
> TNK > case? what case?
> 
> Is this gonna be like the "singular they" confusion again Kev?

you are the only one that's confused.

why are you stalking the people of alt.friends?


> 
> G > Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
> G > himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?
> 
> TNK > he has had the name for like 10
> TNK > years or better,if he wasn't happy
> TNK > with it I think he would change it.
> 
> Can he change this too?

I don't why or if he would want to.

> 
>
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202
> 
> TNK > Whose problem would that be?
> 
> TNK > it looks to me (and I am sure other
> TNK > readers would agree) that is you
> TNK > that has a problem greegor.
> 
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/0f290b9d168728ca
> 
> Moe > Silence me, Tjab by showing me
> Moe > scanned copies of the actual court
> Moe > do***ents at the courthouse. You
> Moe > said you actually saw the court
> Moe > do***ents yourself.  Shall I get the
> Moe > google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
> Moe > Tjab, or are you going to deny you
> Moe > actually posted that?
> 
> tjab > Yes, and yes, liar.
> 
> Moe, As for silencing you by proving that the
> Supreme Court of Iowa did not lie, I'd like
> to know why you think that is reasonable.
> 
> Considering Kent has claimed that he ""set up""
> Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 as a false
> identity for himself, WHY do you think that
> the burden of proof rests with people who
> say he IS Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969?
> 
> Either way, it Kent's problem.

It's you that has a problem with Kent's nym.

> 
> If as he claims, it's a FAKE ID, then it's
> certainly not my fault.

you say that as though he has a driver's license under his usenet nym.

and you having a bug up your ass about it *is* your fault.

> 
> In the real world, it's easy to see why the
> Garage Burglary Felon would want to deny it.

maybe the garage burglary felon will one day come to usenet and tell you.

> 
> Why would somebody adopt the FAKE ID of
> a Garage Burglary Felon at all?

Kent had the nym before the alleged crime took place.

> 
> Hypothetically, If it is a FAKE ID that
> Kent so carefully set up over YEARS,
> then why is he now trying to reverse it?

reverse what? has he been posting as slliW tneK?

> 
> Why would somebody work SO HARD and for
> years to create a FAKE ID and then try to reverse it?
> 
> Who should carry the burden of proof in that case?
> 
> Hypothetically, If Kent really made a FAKE ID for
> himself then why isn't he happy to live with it?
> 
> Whose problem would that be?
> 
> If that were the case, then Who is to blame?
> 
> TNK > to blame for what simpleton?
> 
> The hypothetical FAKE ID.
> 
> TNK > the stalking of Kent and members of
> TNK > alt.friends? that would be *YOU*
> TNK >
> TNK > stalker.
> 

stalker.