In article
<be65a6bb-01d7-44d7-8d56-e395cda5e15a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 5, 8:32=A0pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tjab) wrote:
>> In article
<635374d8-6c13-440b-a0e0-2fc49c4dc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>com>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> forevernitefan =A0<fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On Apr 3, 6:58=3DA0pm, "Kent Wills" <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> "forevernitefan" <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>news:b92ddfea-948b-43f2-88f1-6d97e3183de9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>.
>> >> On Apr 3, 5:08 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> [...]
>>
>> >> >> Very well said.
>>
>> >> >> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
>>
>> >> >> The "clown" aspect reminds me of Kent Wills' famous quotes.
>>
>> >> >Well gag you certaily kow how the legal system works. After all,
>> >> >you've had many experiences and even some time being locked up to
>> >> >prove it.
>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0He was convicted of beating his ex-wife TWICE.
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0You'll note from his posts that he is unable to
admit =
>his
>> >> responsibility. =3DA0It was all her fault.
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0I'm certainly no expert on abusers, and this
question =
>isn't mea=3D
>> >nt to
>> >> imply you are, but isn't it the norm for abusers to state the victim
ma=
>de
>> >> them do it?
>> > Yes, usually the abusers say things like " she provoked me to hit
>> >her" and " she was nagging me: or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
>> >that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see that
>> >pattern clearly and state this with confidence.
>>
>> >> > I've said what constitutes proof for me. If you and " legal
expert"
>> >> >Tjab want to claim what you have is legal proof, feel free to
submit
>> >> >such in a court of law. I am not in " denial" I SAID I would start
to
>> >> >believe you people IF you provided scanned copies of the legal
court
>> >> >documents available at the courthouse in question.
>>
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0Heck, tjab claimed in a thread about the documents
at =
>the court=3D
>> > house
>> >> that he had seen them.
>> >> =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0I still find it amusing how quickly you proved he
lied=
>.
>>
>> > He had it coming.
>>
>> "Yes, usually the abusers say things like 'she provoked me to hit
>> her' and 'she was nagging me' or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
>> that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see
that."
>>
>> -Moe, two seconds earlier
>>
>> (BTW, you proved nothing and never will, bcause you are trying to prove
>> something that never happened.))
>
> This was about Gaggie's excuses for beating his two GFs. Tjab, DO try
>to keep up. My response was about excuses abusers make. I've read
>enough to know, Tjab.
>
> Are your comprehension skills messing up?
>
>
>>
>> >What I find interesting is how he's been weasleing
>> >out of that claim by saying what he " saw" was the stuff on the web
>> >site and OC some summary in a book.
>>
>> Full opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa, in Iowa's official re****ter.
I notice you don't even bother to deny you were lying when you called
the full opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa, in Iowa's official
re****ter, upholding Kent's felony conviction, "some summary in a book."
>> Overcome your denial and turn that over in your head long enough for
>> it to finally register. (Just kidding - of course it long since has.)
>>
>
> Silence me, Tjab by showing me scanned copies of the actual court
>documents at the courthouse. You said you actually saw the court
>documents yourself. Shall I get the google URL of YOUR OWN WORDS,
>Tjab, or are you going to deny you actually posted that?
Yes, and yes, liar.
|
