On Apr 6, 7:09=A0am, " krp" <krp24...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Kunt Wills" <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:ft9cdp$q9f$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> SCAN OF CUBA TRIP TIUCKET
> > =A0 =A0 It helps if you include that part to which you are replying.
>
> =A0 =A0 Sure it does Kunt. The subkect you LIE your ass off about.
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0No projection Kunt - just stating a FACT that you are LYING
yo=
ur ass
> >>>> off!!!!!!
> >>> =A0 =A0 The problem is, YOU are the one lying. This has already been
p=
roved
> >>> several times.
> >>> =A0 =A0 More proof is contained within this post.
>
> =A0 >> =A0 =A0More of your chest beating Kunt? =A0SO far all we jabe is
YO=
U loudly
>
> >> claiming you have PROVED the ticket was altered. That's NOT "proof"
> >> jackass that is your LYING again!
> > =A0 =A0 Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. =A0 I've not
prov=
ed you
> > lied about the ticket. =A0And I've never claimed you did. =A0 I do
find =
it of
> > interest that you think I've proved such.
>
> =A0 =A0 What Kunt? Yopu are amazing, you can't even keep your lies
consist=
ent
> within a post. First you deny you have thewn you brag you have. I get
> whiplash trying to see where you are on the subject. So now you ADMIT
you
> have NOT proved I lied about the ticket.
>
> >>>>> But then you claim to be a CERTIFIED AAAAA+++++++ EXPERT in photo
> >>>>>> recognition.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 There is no such thing, liar.
> >>>> =A0 =A0Kunt - the WORLD knows that. But YOU keep trying to pretend
to=
be
> >>>> the EXPERT you are NOT!
> >>> =A0 =A0 Since I stated at the beginning that I'm not an expert, your
l=
ie
> >>> fails.
> >>> =A0 =A0 You experience a great deal of failure in your life, huh?
> >> =A0 =A0Kunt you don't seem to understand that you continued LOUD
insist=
ence
> >> that you have "PROVED" the document was FAKED,
> > =A0 =A0 When?
>
> =A0 =A0 From the start of the discussion Kunt. It is amusing to see you
ru=
nning
> away from that claim and now admitting at least you can't tell for sure.
I=
f
> course you could IF you had used resources you were provided.
>
> >>based SOLELY on your LOUD claims, IS the same as claiming to be an
EXPER=
T!
> > =A0 =A0 Why do you lie in EVERY post?
>
> =A0 =A0 Yeah right Kunt. PROJECTION.
>
> >>If not you would have dropped the subject LONG ago and admitted you
were=
> >>not sure.
> > =A0 =A0 YOU keep bringing it up. =A0 =A0 You really need to move on.
>
> =A0 =A0 Right Kunt.
>
> >>BUT you obnoxiously claim you have "PROVED" it beyond ANY doubt Kunt.
> > =A0 =A0 =A0When?
>
> =A0 =A0 For months Kunt. Buit your present position is MOST AMUSING.
>
> >>>>>>You're just a smartass Polack trying to invent a story here.
> >>>>>>The issue is straight forward Kunt. You claim ONLY the area of the
> >>>>>>destination is "CLEARLY ALTERED" in your "EXPERT OPINION."
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 That's not the claim I made. =A0 =A0What is the SPECIFIC
rea=
son you're
> >>>>> lying and stating I made a claim I didn't make?
> >>>> =A0 =A0Tap dancing and trying to parse your claims Kunt? You
continue=
to
> >>>> claim it was altered when in fact it was NOT!
> >>> =A0 =A0 Actually, I stated it looked altered. =A0You then claimed I
st=
ated it
> >>> was altered, and I allowed you to prove what a liar you are.
> >> =A0 =A0No Kunt you stated that the destination field "WAS ALTERED"
=A0i=
f you
> >> are
> > =A0 =A0 Liar.
>
> =A0 =A0 You said; "It was CLEARLY altered." (emphasis added)
>
> >> NOW admitting that it "ONLY LOOKS ALTERED" and are backing fown off
you=
r
> >> claim to have "PROVED that it was altered, that's all you hae to
admit.=
"
> > =A0 =A0 Liar. =A0My claim hasn't changed at all.
>
> =A0 =A0 Sure it has Kunt - your sides on the issue is like sitting
center =
court
> at a tennis match. One tends to get whiplash as you send the ball back
and=
> forth on this.
> Either it was altered or it wasn't. Either you PROVED it was altered or
yo=
u
> didn't. Pick a lane Kunt.
>
> >>>>>>Which is ludicrous on its face. Anyone can look at ALL the
informati=
on
> >>>>>>on the document and check it to see if your "EXPERT OPINION" holds
> >>>>>>water.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 Since it wasn't and isn't an EXPERT opinion, your latest
lie=
> >>>>> fails.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 I'm sure you're used to it.
> >>>> =A0 =A0It's just your FULL OF SHIT OPINION Kunt.
> >>> =A0 =A0 It was and is my honest opinion. =A0That you can't recognize
t=
his is
> >>> to be expected.
> >> =A0 =A0Yes but, Kunt, you claim to have "PROVED" that it WAS (in
fact)
> >> altered!
> > =A0 =A0 When?
>
> =A0 =A0 WHIPLASH AGAIN.
>
> >> Which is it Polack, pick a lane?
> > =A0 =A0 My position hasn't changed. =A0The destination field has a
light=
er ink
> > intensity than the rest of the =A0ticket.
>
> =A0 =A0 So? Is that uncommon on an ancient line printer like the
airlines =
use?
> What's your point Kunt?
>
> >>>>>>Check the airline to see WHERE that flight number goes. Does it go
t=
o
> >>>>>>the place that appears in the destination field? =A0 You TRIED and
I=
do
> >>>>>>mean DESPERATELY TRIED to suggest that the flight went MANY MANY
oth=
er
> >>>>>>places.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 No I didn't.
> >>>> =A0 =A0Yes you DID liar.
> >>> =A0 =A0 Why do you lie? =A0 =A0 Roger stated that, not me.
> >> =A0 =A0He picked up on your lead Kunt.
> > =A0 =A0 Liar.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt he took YOUR point and merely embelished it to the absurd.
He=
's not
> real bright that way.
>
> >>>>>>You listed places that flight number went like Singapore.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 No I didn't.
> >>>> =A0 =A0Yes you did TRY to suggest that flight 9514 went to other
plac=
es. IT
> >>>> DOES NOT - YOU LIED!!!
> >>> =A0 =A0 I never even suggested it. =A0That was Roger. =A0 =A0
Fregoli =
much?
> >> =A0 =A0You INITIATED the claim Roger just RAN with it.
> > =A0 =A0 Why do you lie in EVERY post?
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt YOU introduced the idea that flight 9514 goes to other
places=
.. Your
> IDIOT (mongoloid) buddy Roger just went out to Google and searched for
EVE=
RY
> fukkkking airline in the world that had a flight 9514 and started
listing
> them to try to help you PROVE your point that the scan was "CLEARLY
> ALTERED." It is funny seeing you now RUNNING like a chicken with no head
> from your early claims. Funny we keep hearing the CLUCKING from the
severe=
d
> head too.
>
> >>>>>>But that was not the same AIRLINE listed. YOU claim, IN YOUR
EXPERT
> >>>>>>OPINION, that the airline doesn't make any difference.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 No I didn't.
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0Yes you did.
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 Liar.
>
> >> =A0 =A0Yes you are.
> > =A0 =A0 Is there a topic about which you won't lie? =A0Seriously. =A0I
w=
ould like
> > to discuss something with you and have you NOT lie about everything
just=
> > so that I can state I've had a conversation with you during which you
> > didn't lie.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt - has it escaped your attention that whenever anyone takes
se=
rious
> issue with YOUR BULLSHIT - that your response it to accuse THEM of
lying?
> You do recognize, don't you Polack, that this IS a pattern with you?
Anyon=
e
> who takes strong disagreement with the BULLSHIT you spew, you claim is a
> LIAR and only YOU tell the truth when the simple fact, is, Kunt, that
you
> are the one most frequently wrong. Your defense is to start calling the
> people demonstrating your crap is wrong to be liars. When in point of
FACT=
-
> it is YOU who is the liar here Kunt. On the subject of the scan of my
> airline ticket you have taken 20 different sides on it many in stark
> conflict with earlier ones. Again watching you is like sitting center
cour=
t
> at a tennis match. =A0You are now playing yourself and you are too
STUPID =
to
> know it. It's fun watching you put spin and reverse spin on the ball.
You
> keep tripping yourself up Kunt.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>But then you say the AIRLINE field listed (American) doesn't
appear =
to
> >>>>>>be altered.
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 I've made no comment on the airline field.
>
> >>> =A0 =A0Oh Are you NOW claiming that it was ALSO altered? Yes or No
Kun=
t.
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 I've never made any claim about the airline field, dullard.
> >>> =A0 =A0 Here's a hint: =A0Not everyone who disagrees with you is me.
>
> >> =A0 =A0OH the SECRET MILLIONS AND MILLIONS who believe it was altered
t=
oo?
>
> > =A0 =A0 I wasn't aware the number was so high.
> > =A0 =A0 Oh wait. =A0You're lying again.
> >> Beside Moore and your ditzy buddies, WHO? Who else has agreed with
your=
> >> "EXPERT OPINION" Kunt?
> > =A0 =A0 Since I've not given an expert opinion (you're psychologically
U=
NABLE
> > to be honest about this), there can be no agreement with it.
>
> =A0 =A0 Kunt you berlieve that EVERYTHING you say is an EXPERT OPINION
and=
those
> who disagree with your PREPOSTEROUS BULLSHIT are LIARS. Eveyone but YOU
> Kunt. Ask your Psychiatrist WIFE to diagnose that one.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>So the REAL issue is where does American Eagle Flight 9514 go?
> >>>>>>MILLIONS and MILLIONS of different places? Thousands? Dozens?
Many?
>
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 You frequently claim the number one equals a number far
grea=
ter
> >>>>> than one.
>
> >>>> =A0 =A0No that's YOU who claims "ONLY ONE" means a SHITLOAD of
other
> >>>> places.
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 Again, you are alone in your belief that one equals any
number=
> >>> greater than one.
> >>> =A0 =A0 When will you accept that no one, save you, thinks one
equals =
any
> >>> number greater than one?
>
> >> =A0 =A0You are the one suffering that delsuion. When you tried to use
G=
lenn
> >> Rogers as a SOURCE to support YOUR notion that internet access was
> >> ABUNDANT in Holguin, you didn't read his article well.
> > [Snip of Kenny-Bob's same lies about my claims]
>
> RUN KUNT RUN!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sheeitt, I get it from KRaP's rants that apparently guys get their
version of PMS.
Seriously Kenny-Bob, have you actually read your posts before you hit
send? When you get all pissy you make more typos than I do. And in the
process you make yourself look like an idiot, a loser and someone who
seriously needs psychiatric help.
You're HOW old and you still act like a brat?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/
|
