Moe > GOOD GOD PEOPLE WHAT WASTES YOU ALL ARE!!!
G > Yes, Moe, everybody is crazy except for you! LOL
Moe > Greg, I did not say crazy. I said WASTE.
> Honestly look at the damn posting activity. Threads 200 to nearly a
> thousand posts long, all during THIS year. And how many people are
> involved in this? At most nine people.
Moe > And for what? You dirtballs even speculated
Moe > at my disapearance for a few days from
Moe > posting. Snide, mean remarks about me,
Moe > speculatiing about my sex life, and after
Moe > all that you expct me to LIKE you little shit?
G > I thought you were ADVERTIZING your
G > sexual angst about men with "constant erections".
G >
G > What part of that was not something you
G > started yourself?
> The problem is not my alleged " angst", ( which BTW is not
> accurate), it is the reactions you and your fellow jerks havebeen
> posting about my observation of the dichomomy of porn videos. Much of
> tehc laims aere from you " guys" about me, speculating on my sexual
> experience or whatever.
> I am open about the fact that I am a straight female, that I LIKE a
> well proportion and built male body ( Chipendale's calendar, among
> other things) and that I have a boyfriend who s a truly nice abd
> considerate guy. I also said that I DO NOT like being sodomized
> ( which is in essence what " anal intervourse" is) as I see it as
> demeaning and, quite franlky, disgusting. If that makes me "
> inexperienced" fine. I'm not a whore. Everything else you, Eric . KRaP
> and " LK" have said about me was from your own shitty minds, not from
> the facts.
Moe > I have hand an experience with a BF
Moe > who tried to dominate, humliate and
Moe > control me.
Now WHY would your own boyfriend do that? <grin>
Moe > He didn't last long because
Moe > I am a strong woman.
Chant it like a mantra, you emotional retard.
Moe > Your " experience" with females is well known,
Moe > even with your excuses. And I've made it quite
Moe > clear what I think about you. It's no wonder
Moe > that you associate with them.
Moe, Your angst and emotional baggage was
obvious LONG before this confession!
Moe > And you " boys" are my alteratives?
Moe > Hardly. I've met guys a LOT
Moe > better than any of you.
Leading a "sheltered life" there Moe?
The newsgroups are your life??
What a retard!
Moe > And here's the irony, Greg. For all you
Moe > Jerk Circle guys attacking Kent Wills,
Moe > Kent hasd shown hmself to BE a
Moe > gentleman in regards to women.
By sucking up to you he has proven the opposite.
Moe > I cannot say the same for you and your buddies here.
Moe >
Moe > Sure I'm crude. I'm also inventive in my " vulgarlity".
Moe > Unlike KRaP and Jonesie. Had you bothered to
Moe > actually know me as a person, you would see
Moe > how multi-faceted I actually am.
Multi faceted you say? LOL
Moe > BTW if I was so " angsty" about
Moe > males , why do I call a certain area
Moe > of a guy the " goodies"? Wouldn't I
Moe > have less appealing terms for it?
You did "vent" about constant erections.
How old are you, Moe ?
On Mar 31, 10:38=A0pm, LK <Patis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 5:36=A0pm, forevernitefan <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 3:29=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 30, 11:26=A0am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > forevernitefan wrote:
> > > > > On Mar 27, 11:22 am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > >> Moe > GOOD GOD PEOPLE WHAT WASTES YOU ALL ARE!!!
>
> > > > >> Yes, Moe, everybody is crazy except for you! LOL
>
> > > > > Greg, I =A0did not say crazy. I said WASTE.
>
> > > > > =A0Honestly look at the damn posting activity. Threads =A0200 to
n=
early a
> > > > > thousand posts long, all during THIS year. And how many people
are=
> > > > > involved in this? =A0At most nine people.
>
> > > Moe > And for what? You dirtballs even speculated
> > > Moe > at my disapearance for a few days from
> > > Moe > posting. Snide, mean remarks about me,
> > > Moe > speculatiing about my sex life, and after
> > > Moe > all that you expct me to LIKE you little shit?
>
> > > I thought you were ADVERTIZING your
> > > sexual angst about men with "constant erections".
>
> > > What part of that was not something you
> > > started yourself?
>
> > =A0The problem is not my alleged " angst", ( which BTW =A0is not
> > accurate), it is the reactions you and your fellow jerks havebeen
> > posting about my observation of the dichomomy of porn videos.
>
> Speaking for myself, I was impressed with your knowledge of the
> subject.
>
> > Much of
> > tehc laims aere from you " guys" about me, speculating on my sexual
> > experience or whatever.
>
> > =A0I am open about the fact that I =A0am a straight female, that I
LIKE =
a
> > well proportion and built male body ( Chipendale's calendar, among
> > other things) and that I have a boyfriend who s a truly nice abd
> > considerate guy. I also said that I DO NOT like being sodomized
> > ( which is in essence what " anal intervourse" is) as I see it as
> > demeaning and, quite franlky, disgusting.
>
> According to Kent, unless someone experiences something they can't
> know if they would like it or not. =A0Assuming that his logic is
> correct, Moe would have had have such an experience in order to make
> such a claim as "I DO NOT like being sodomized." =A0I'm assuming that
> based on what she's seen in the movies she might think that she
> wouldn't like it, but without the experience how could she possibly
> know?
>
> > If that makes me "
> > inexperienced" fine. I'm not a whore. Everything else you, Eric . KRaP
> > and " LK" have said about me was from your own shitty minds, not from
> > the facts.
>
> Shitty minds? =A0That's cute. =A0Aren't you the pig who gave a detailed
> explanation of anal sex in porn movies.
>
>
>
> > =A0I have hand an experience with a BF who tried to dominate, humliate
> > and control me. He didn't last long because I am a strong woman. Your
> > " experience" with females is well known, even with your excuses. And
> > I've made it quite clear what I =A0think about you. =A0It's no wonder
th=
at
> > you associate with them.
>
> > =A0And you " boys" are my alteratives? Hardly. I've met guys a LOT
> > better than any of you. And here's the irony, Greg. For all you Jerk
> > Circle guys attacking Kent Wills, Kent hasd shown hmself to BE a
> > gentleman in regards to women.
>
> > =A0I cannot say the same =A0for you and your buddies here.
>
> > =A0Sure I'm crude. I'm also inventive in my " vulgarlity". Unlike KRaP
> > and Jonesie. Had you bothered to actually know me as a person, you
> > would see how multi-faceted I actually am.
>
> > =A0BTW if I was so " angsty" about males , why do I call a certain
area
> > of a guy the " goodies"? Wouldn't I have less appealing terms for it?
>
> > Moe
|
