In article
<635374d8-6c13-440b-a0e0-2fc49c4dc58d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 3, 6:58=A0pm, "Kent Wills" <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "forevernitefan" <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:b92ddfea-948b-43f2-88f1-6d97e3183de9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Apr 3, 5:08 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Very well said.
>>
>> >> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
>>
>> >> The "clown" aspect reminds me of Kent Wills' famous quotes.
>>
>> >Well gag you certaily kow how the legal system works. After all,
>> >you've had many experiences and even some time being locked up to
>> >prove it.
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0He was convicted of beating his ex-wife TWICE.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0You'll note from his posts that he is unable to admit his
>> responsibility. =A0It was all her fault.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0I'm certainly no expert on abusers, and this question isn't
mea=
>nt to
>> imply you are, but isn't it the norm for abusers to state the victim
made
>> them do it?
> Yes, usually the abusers say things like " she provoked me to hit
>her" and " she was nagging me: or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
>that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see that
>pattern clearly and state this with confidence.
>
>> > I've said what constitutes proof for me. If you and " legal expert"
>> >Tjab want to claim what you have is legal proof, feel free to submit
>> >such in a court of law. I am not in " denial" I SAID I would start to
>> >believe you people IF you provided scanned copies of the legal court
>> >documents available at the courthouse in question.
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0Heck, tjab claimed in a thread about the documents at the
court=
> house
>> that he had seen them.
>> =A0 =A0 =A0I still find it amusing how quickly you proved he lied.
>
> He had it coming.
"Yes, usually the abusers say things like 'she provoked me to hit
her' and 'she was nagging me' or some such excuse. They NEVER admit
that they were at fault. I've read enough cases of abusers to see that."
-Moe, two seconds earlier
(BTW, you proved nothing and never will, bcause you are trying to prove
something that never happened.))
>What I find interesting is how he's been weasleing
>out of that claim by saying what he " saw" was the stuff on the web
>site and OC some summary in a book.
Full opinion of the Supreme Court of Iowa, in Iowa's official re****ter.
Overcome your denial and turn that over in your head long enough for
it to finally register. (Just kidding - of course it long since has.)
>But then, Tjab is not known for
>being honorable.
Oh the irony.
|
