Greegor wrote:
> forevernitefan (Moe) <fvrn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Moe > As for him being a burglar felon, I've explained
> Moe > what would convince me of that claim. I will
> Moe > not go to the courthouse for the alleged
> Moe > records because it's not up to me to PROVE
> Moe > your claims. The fact that not one of you
> Moe > ( even Greg, who is closest to the courthouse
> Moe > in question) has bothered to even see if these
> Moe > files actually exist on the MONTHS you've
> Moe > been hurling this accusation, well that tells
> Moe > a lot about all of you. It suggests that you
> Moe > boys know that the whole " convicted gagage
> Moe > burgalry felon" crap is a straw man, and it's
> Moe > too risky for any of you to go that last step
> Moe > and find the court documents, because of
> Moe > the distinct possibility that they don' t exist.
>
> tjab > The fact that you do not accept the full published
> tjab > decision of the Supreme Court of Iowa denying
> tjab > Kent's appeal of his felony burglary conviction as
> tjab > proof that he is a convicted felon shows that you
> tjab > are either incredibly ignorant of how the legal
> tjab > system works or in the deepest denial anyone
> tjab > anywhere has ever seen. Well, either that or you
> tjab > are trolling, intentionally making yourself look
> tjab > the fool in order to see if you can get a little
> tjab > attention for yourself.
>
> Very well said.
>
> The deep denial reminds me of cult members.
The cult of the ****eating lying ****s, Kunt Wills chapter.
|
